Author: mopress

  • Rio Grande Barrios Want Court to Stop Helicopter Spraying

    by Greg Moses

    To seal the border would they kill the river? For the time being, US Border Patrol officials say they will not spray herbicides to kill the wild Carrizo Cane along the banks of the Rio Grande River. But wary residents along the river have filed a federal lawsuit to guarantee their rights to an ecologically safe border.

    In lawsuit documents released on Wednesday, an association of residents who live near the Rio Grande River charge that the Border Patrol did not take a “hard look” before declaring that proposed helicopter spraying of herbicide would have “no significant impact” on the river environment.

    Residents of the Barrio De Colores association say the August 2008 environmental impact statement issued by the border patrol “cannot stand” because the analysis of impacts was not adequate, reasonable alternatives were not fully considered, and residents were not adequately notified of their rights to participate in the environmental impact review.

    Some recent news reports have villified the wild Carrizo Cane plants for their ability to grow tall and thick enough to serve as co-conspirators in border smuggling operations. But environmental scientist Dr. Jim Earhart argues that poisoning the plants is not necessary if goats and donkeys are allowed to eat them.

    The plants have been considered pests in the valley since they were introduced by European settlers centuries ago. Spraying herbicides from helicopters, however, would only compound the damage done to the river by outside forces.

    “The Rio Grande does not belong to the United States,” said Executive Director of the Rio Grande International Study Center Jay Johnson-Castro at Wednesday’s outdoor press conference. “Nor does it belong to Mexico. It belongs to we the people.”

    Residents of the Barrio De Colores association are not satisfied by this week’s assurances that the spraying has been postponed as a consequence of meetings between the border patrol and Mexican officials.

    Says attorney Israel Reyna, “The day the court says it’s not going to happen, that’s when it’s not going to happen.”

    [Sources: KGNS, FoxNews.com, and Barrio De Colores. Read the federal court petition here.]

  • Irma Muniz: Update on Ramsey's Clemency

    Dear Friends:

    I have just returned from a three day visit with Ramsey in El Reno, Oklahoma. Our time spent together was blessing, as we shared our faith and plans for the upcoming months.

    Ramsey was sent to El Reno, Oklahoma just after he had been transferred closer to home in Three Rivers, Texas. His transfer to Three Rivers came about through the assistance of congressmen, senators, and many supporters.

    He had been in Three Rivers, Texas just over five months and had begun to see his attorney so that he could reopen his case and prove his innocence. Without warning, he was transported to El Reno, Oklahoma where he is now detained. The reason for this move was never substantiated and Ramsey Muniz is in exile once again for political reasons.

    At the end of 2008 we submitted an application for a Commutation of Sentence, knowing that the chances for it being approved were slim. Attached [below] is a letter from Mr. Ronald Rodgers, Pardon Attorney, who responded to the application.

    Ramsey Muniz was not granted a Commutation of Sentence and through research we learned that pardons and commutations were granted to those who had close political ties or had made substantial contributions to the Republican Party. We now plan to submit an application under the administration of President Barack Obama.

    Because we have a different administration, we are formulating strategies for a movement to move Ramsey back to Texas. We will seek your support once again and know that we will provide details in the near future.

    Ramsey asks that everyone remember Cesar Chavez and take part in events that commemorate his birth. Cesar Chavez was born on March 31, 1927, and there will be marches in San Antonio, Texas, Corpus Christi, Texas, California, Colorado, and many other states throughout the country. This is important because our time has come! We must seize the moment as others are doing to proclaim our spirituality, culture, history, and identity during these changing times!

    Sincerely,
    Irma Muniz


    US Department of Justice
    Pardon Attorney

    Washington, DC
    January 29, 2009

    Memorandum

    To: Warden
    Federal Correctional Institution – El Reno

    From: Ronald L. Rodgers
    Pardon Attorney

    Subject: Ramiro R. Muniz
    Application for Executive Clemency

    Please advise Ramiro R. Muniz that his application for executive clemency was carefully considered in this department and the White House, and the decision was reached that favorable action is not warranted. The application was therefore denied on Dec. 23, 2008. Under the Constitution there is no appeal from this decision. As a matter of well-established policy we do not disclose the reasons for the decision in a clemency matter. In addition, deliberative communications pertaining to agency and presidential decision-making are confidential and not available under existing case law interpreting the Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act. If the applicant wishes to reapply for executive clemency, the applicant will become eligible to do so one year from the date on which the President denied the current application.

    Please ensure that the applicant receives a copy of this memorandum reflecting the denial of this clemency application.

    Editor’s Note: bold faced emphasis in original.–gm

  • Against Obamanomics: Warnings from British Liberal Democrats

    It started out as a desk-cleaning exercise on Christmas Day. We opened a catalog of Henry George materials.

    Half a day later (from a still messy desk) we were sending an email to Neale Upstone at the Cambridge (UK) City Council, advising him of our newfound interest in Henry George.

    Councillor Upstone replied with links to a movement. A new coalition based upon Georgist principles of Land Value economics has just released news (as of midnight GMT) that a dozen “think-tanks, charities and political pressure groups” will be advocating a Georgist resolution to the latest economic meltdown.

    “History shows that economic bailouts will not provide a long-term solution,” says Robin Smith of the Systemic Fiscal Reform Group think-tank, “because Land, which is at the heart of the matter, has been obscured from political, media and academic scrutiny.”

    Following the Land Value analysis of 19th-Century American populist economist Henry George, the new coalition wants “to shift tax off enterprise and labour onto a form of annual Land Value Taxation,” says the chairman of the coalition, John Lipetz.

    The new Coalition for Economic Justice (CEJ) will try to get a national debate going in the UK. But the issues they are raising sound relevant to anyone seeking critical tools of analysis for the early contours of Obamanomics.

    Councillor Upstone puts the case plainly. Against the emerging outlines of a Keynsian Green New Deal (GND) he argues in favor of a Georgist Systemic Fiscal Reform (SFR).

    The Georgist approach is appealing as a quick study, because it connects with our common-sense insight that real-estate speculation is the giant culprit of our global economic meltdown. What the SFR movement adds to this insight is the Georgist claim that land speculation is the foundational cause of many bad effects besides the cycles of land value crashes.

    Henry George learned his economics by watching San Francisco. He seems to be calling out from beyond the grave: California did it again!

    So if you like the idea of change and want to think a little harder about what it could look like, here’s the press release from the Georgist SFR movement:


    EMBARGO 00:01 27th December 2008

    In an unprecedented move to advocate an original solution to the current economic crisis, twelve think-tanks, charities and political pressure groups have joined forces. The new cross-party group, called the Coalition for Economic Justice (CEJ), has argued for the reduction of existing taxes to be replaced by an annual Land Value Tax in order to prevent future crises and alleviate the current one.

    The Coalition issued in a statement: “The current economic crisis highlights, yet again, the inadequacies of the current economic system which is unstable and deeply flawed. Events are clearly demonstrating that the speculative rise in land prices is a common feature of the repeated economic booms and busts. In order to address this problem we call for a new approach that delivers both economic justice and prosperity for all. This solution must be based upon the annual collection of land value for public purposes”.
    Matthew Elliott, Chief Executive of the TaxPayers’ Alliance commented: “I look forward to learning more about the campaign as it develops in the New Year. I very much hope that the coalition manages to generate a national debate on taxation, particularly now we are in recession.”

    The Chair of the CEJ, John Lipetz explains that “in response to the financial crisis, a group of charities, think-tanks, political factions and pressure groups from right across the political spectrum have for the first time sat down together to agree the best way to cure the current crisis, and prevent future ones. This is to shift tax off enterprise and labour onto a form of annual Land Value Taxation. We invite others sharing our concern to join us.”

    Robin Smith of the think-tank Systemic Fiscal Reform Group says “It is clear that enterprise is once again taking the hit, particularly hard working small businesses, from this latest debt-fuelled land boom. History shows that economic bailouts will not provide a long-term solution because Land, which is at the heart of the matter, has been obscured from political, media and academic scrutiny. The founders of the CEJ are calling for new thinking around economic reform and it represents a real movement towards progress and prosperity for all.”

    Heather Wetzel of the Professional Land Reform Group adds: “If we are to establish economic stability, encourage sustainable growth and end poverty it is necessary to look for new solutions. An annual Land Value Tax on all land will prevent future land price speculation, enable modest interest rates on business investment and provide income for both essential infrastructure investment and for the reduction of taxes on individuals and trade.”

    Organisations involved in the CEJ are:

    Labour Land Campaign (LLC)
    Liberal Democrat Action for Land Taxation and Economic Reform (ALTER)
    Social Liberalist Party (SLP)
    Systemic Fiscal Reform Group (SFRG)
    School of Economic Science (SES)
    Land is Free (LF)
    Henry George Foundation (HGF)
    Land Value Taxation Campaign (LVTC)
    Professional Land Reform Group (PLRG)
    Christian Council for Monetary Justice (CCMJ)
    Global Justice Movement (GJM)
    The 1909 Group

    *******************

    END

    *******************

    INFO:

    Information about Land Value Tax
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_value_tax

    *******************

    CONTACT:

    Chairman – John Lipetz
    robinsmith3.googlepages.com/coalitionforeconomicjustice

    Labour Land Campaign (LLP) – Dave Wetzel
    www.labourland.org/

    Liberal Democrat Action for Land Taxation and Economic Reform (ALTER) – Tony Vickers & Chris Glover
    libdemsalter.org.uk/

    Social Liberalist Party (SLP) – Anton Howes
    www.voteliberalist.org

    Systemic Fiscal Reform Group (SFRG) – Robin Smith
    www.systemicfiscalreform.org

    School of Economic Science (SES) – Peter Bowman
    www.schooleconomicscience.org

    Henry George Foundation (HGF) – David Triggs
    www.henrygeorgefoundation.org/home/

    Land Value Taxation Campaign (LVTC) – Henry Law
    www.landvaluetax.org

    Professional Land Reform Group (PLRG) – Heather Wetzel

    Land is Free (LF) – Tommas Graves
    www.landisfree.co.uk

    Christian Council for Monetary Justice (CCMJ) – Peter Challen
    www.ccmj.org

    Global Justice Movement (GJM) – Peter Challen
    www.binaryeconomics.net

    The 1909 Group – Jock Coats
    www.1909.org.uk


    Excerpt from article on local taxation by Dr Roy Douglas from the Land is Free website:

    Such a tax, when designed for the special needs of local government, is known as Site Value Rating, or SVR. To apply SVR, the value of all sites in the local authority area would first be assessed. Professional va
    luer
    s assure us that this would be a simple and cheap operation. A tax, or rate, would then be levied on the basis of that valuation, just as the old rating system used to levy a tax, or rate, on the basis of the total value of a property (i.e., site plus “improvements”). As site values vary over time, periodic (perhaps annual) reassessment would be necessary.

    The principle behind SVR is that each occupier will pay for the benefit he receives from what he has not created, but will not be penalised for what he has done to make the property he owns more valuable. One of the arguments in favour of Local Income Tax (which, as we have seen. is really flawed) is that it will fall most heavily on the people most able to bear it. As wealthy people usually live on valuable sites, while poor people live on less valuable sites, SVR will do exactly that.

    But will there be hard cases, such as elderly people on small incomes, whose site values are high? Yes, indeed, SVR, like any other kind of taxation, may involve hard cases, unless Parliament makes careful provision to avoid those hardcases. But the possibility of such hard cases arising provides a challenge to the legislators to avoid them. It does not provide an excuse for failing to deal with the general problem.


    From the left side of the Atlantic, check out the work of Renegade Economist Fred Harrison, a Yank of the Georgist persuasion.

  • Jennifer Gale Death Caused by Lack of Shelter for Transgender Homeless

    Editor’s Note: Usually this is the time of year when downtown bus riders in Austin listen to Jennifer Gale singing Christmas carols. No more sweet fa-la-la’s from Jennifer. We should have sung along.–gm

    Equality Texas mourns the death of Jennifer Gale, a 47-year-old transgender homeless woman who died yesterday. Jennifer’s body was found Wednesday morning. She was lying in an outdoor walkway at the First English Lutheran Church in Central Austin.

    A perennial candidate for public office in Austin and Dallas, Jennifer’s notoriety came through years of putting herself in the public eye. She took a shot at nearly every city office, from council seats, to the mayor’s office. She never won, but in 2004, Gale came closer than ever, winning more than 38 percent of the vote for a seat on the Austin ISD School Board.

    Jennifer’s voice rang through Austin Council Chamber doors every week, often times in support of the homeless population of which she was a part.

    “Let’s give the homeless a place to exercise that need jobs and need help,” said Gale Tuesday night before the city’s Health Services Board.

    Her death points to critical problems faced by the homeless, and especially by homeless women and the transgender homeless.

    “Jennifer most nights slept outdoors,” said Austin Mayor Will Wynn. “Jennifer, we believe, is the 136th person who has died sleeping on the streets (of Austin) over the last 12 months.”

    Marti Bier, policy aide for Austin City Council Member Randi Shade, said, “Something Jennifer would never talk about, but was a reality for her, is that she is a transwoman living in a transphobic society. Homelessness in the trans-community is a really big problem, and one that goes ignored. There are no laws in Texas protecting transgender people, whether from job discrimination, housing discrimination or hate crimes.

    “There was really nowhere for Jennifer Gale to go to protect herself from the cold last night,” said Bier. “The Salvation Army (the only shelter in town that takes in women) would not let her in there unless she was grouped with the men (which includes sleeping with, and showering with, other homeless men). They would make her use her male birth name and completely disregard, and disrespect, her identity as a trans-woman. There is so much to be learned from Jennifer Gale, and so much to be worked on in our community.”

    Equality Texas, the Transgender Education Network of Texas, and City of Austin officials are now working together to address changes in policy, or enforcement of existing policy, that might prevent another tragic loss of life. The City of Austin’s non-discrimination ordinance is inclusive of sexual orientation and gender identity with regard to employment and public accommodations. The ordinance includes certain religious and private club exemptions, which will be reviewed for applicability to the delivery of shelter services for the homeless.

    Source: email from Equality Texas

    a righteous link from Pam’s House Blend here. Thanks Pam and Autumn.

  • A Texas Growth Economy: From Shopping and Eating Out to Global Transport

    By Greg Moses

    As folks debate ways to pump the economy, November employment statistics remind us that

    83 percent of nonfarm workers in Texas earn paychecks in the private sector.

    Of the 10.7 million workers (nonfarm, not seasonally adjusted), 8.9 million are private

    sector compared to 1.8 million government workers.

    While it may be possible for government to pick up masses of workers to labor on roads,

    bridges, and parks, or in emergency rooms, health clinics, and schools, there seems to be

    obvious truth in the worry that this plan of action would raise taxes.

    Still we should note that of the 32,700 net new jobs (actual, not seasonally adjusted)

    added to Texas payrolls in November of 2008, at least 12,000 (or 37 percent) were added by

    government, overwhelmingly at the local level.

    Since there is no income tax in Texas, these jobs were funded by sales taxes and property

    taxes. And while it does seem obvious that every new government job is to be counted as an

    absolute increase in public tax burden, we’d like to remember some old sayings about ounces

    of prevention.

    After all, what sort of private sector employer is going to stick around very long in a

    territory where taxpayers have pulled down their liabilities to zero by de-funding every

    conceivable public service. Even the famous Laffer curve assumes that taxation has some

    optimal rate.

    From the point of view of civil rights development, it would be a cruel and unusual

    economy that sets no public standards whatsoever to live by.

    Nevertheless, let’s remember that 83 percent of the existing workforce in Texas does not

    go to work for a government paycheck.

    Now we’re going to leave aside the question of how many private workers depend upon a

    government contract. So our KBR readers should not go around thinking that we ignore all

    the public butter that gets spread on private bread.

    But let’s go where the majority of workers live and try to prosper — in the private

    sector.

    It’s interesting in Texas that there are about as many workers in the “Goods Producing”

    sector of the economy as there are in “Government” — about 1.8 million. But whereas the

    government sector grew in November, the goods producing sector shrank (by about 6,000

    jobs).

    Not all parts of the goods producing sector lost jobs. In mining and oil and gas, about

    a 1,000 new jobs were added.

    Texas construction lost only a couple of hundred jobs, but the story would have been

    worse if not for “Utility System Construction” which added 1,000 jobs. How much of that

    private employment on utility systems depended upon public financing we’ll leave open to

    further questioning.

    Manufacturing, as you might guess, is still losing jobs in Texas. About 2,000 jobs were

    lost in this sector during November, with losses in the wood, computer, and electronics

    areas. We now have 924,800 manufacturing jobs left here.

    It’s interesting to see that some sectors of manufacturing actually grew: “Fabricated

    Metal Product Manufacturing” picked up 300 jobs; “Machinery Manufacturing” picked up 200

    jobs; “Agriculture, Construction, and Mining Machinery Manufacturing” picked up 500 jobs;

    “Transportation Equipment Manufacturing” picked up 500 jobs; and “Aerospace Product and

    Parts Manufacturing” picked up 400 jobs.

    No doubt there is some “public sector” contracting in these sophisticated heavy metal

    operations in Texas, although I’m guessing we could wish for a healthier mix of “peace” to

    “war” priorities.

    When it comes to non-durable goods, Texas employed some 308,200 workers in November,

    which is 700 fewer workers than October. It was a bad month for food (-400), plastics (-

    200), and paper (-200). But a better month for animal slaughtering (+100) and products made

    from petroleum and coal (+700) and chemicals (+200).

    In the private sector, “Service” is the mammoth sector of the Texas economy. That’s

    where 7.1 million workers were employed in November, an increase of 26,700 workers over

    October. About 20,000 of those new jobs were split between clotting stores and department

    stores. Another 5,000 jobs were added by “Other General Merchandise Stores.”

    Information services fell by another 400 jobs, which is why you see more people like me

    doing this grunt work for free (actually, the newspaper people are holding the line; nothing

    lost, nothing gained).

    In the “Finance and Insurance” sector, jobs are down slightly overall (-200), but there

    is a growth niche in “Credit Intermediation,” which added 1,100 jobs.

    In the professional services sector, lawyers, accountants, architects, and computer

    experts are all finding fewer cubicles available.

    Education and health care, on the other hand, are growing modestly; while “Leisure and

    Hospitality” continue their slow decline.

    In Texas, we are pleased to report, “Food Services and Drinking Places” are still “help

    wanted” areas, with 2,500 new jobs added in November, 2008.

    So if you want to help grow jobs in the Texas economy, especially if you’re a government

    worker, go out and buy some new clothes, steer a shopping cart through your neighborhood

    department store, and take the family out for dinner and drinks. And don’t forget to tip as

    if it was your own salary you were figuring up.

    Beyond these sorts of stopgap subsidies that we can share with each other, there do seem

    to be some healthy fundamentals in the current economic profile in Texas, considering that

    heavy machinery is growing jobs along with education and health services.

    And when you think about all the experience that Texans accrue getting from one end of

    the state to the other, why shouldn’t Texas step up to global leadership in the design,

    management, and manufacture of transportation systems and services? Couldn’t we teach

    ourselves to travel in ways that would prepare us to teach the world?

    Oh, and remember not to shoplift. However, if you can look like you might be shoplifting could it create more jobs for security guards? Check out Grits for Breakfast on the shoplifting rate.