Category: Uncategorized

  • El Dia de los Muertos

    By Ramsey Muniz – Tezcatlipoca

    There is a day that pertains to our religious culture
    which connects the earth, heaven, and nature. It is
    a day when we realize the true essence of cosmic visions
    which prove that we are truly a part of Mother Earth,
    heaven, and the spiritual realm. On that day, the veil
    that separates the living from the dead is removed,
    and we are reunited with the loving spirits of our
    ancestors, forefathers and deceased family members.
    It is a day of rejoicing, communing, sharing, praying,
    fasting, and meditating with our ancestors and family
    members that now reside in Ilhuicatlitic (the heavens),
    because once again we share our ancestral spirituality
    on earth. It is a day that truly brings us together
    with our past in worship to our gods and rejoicing as
    one world, one people one nation in our minds and hearts
    for the past, present and future. It is a day so
    religious and spiritually powerful, that even five
    hundred years ago, priests like Sahagun, Torquemada,
    Molina, Duran, and others realized the power of
    Teotleco — the arrival of the gods. They repeatedly
    witnessed the spiritual ancestral power granted from
    the past to the present and future raza on El Día
    de los Muertos.

    History reveals that the invaders and present
    society began to taint the meaning of this day and
    month with ominous misconceptions, stripping us
    of our cultural foundation — the spiritual sharing
    between the heavens and earth. The destruction of
    our cultural beliefs on this day deteriorated to the
    point that eventually this country, the United States
    of Amnesia, displaced the importance and value of
    Teotleco and El Dia De Los Muertos, and made it a
    day embedded with monsters, goblins and appearances
    of evil omens. It replaced the day of remembrance
    of our ancestors, family members and friends who have
    passed away into our cultural heavens.

    Hermanos y hermanas, was it by choice, or
    ignorance? Do we continue to permit the devious
    subtle destructive strategy of the European invaders
    and this present day society to destroy the truthful
    and spiritual meaning of this day? The destruction
    of our cultural knowledge and remembrance of that
    special time was replaced with a prank filled
    celebration — a day now commercially referred to
    as "Halloween." It is now a night spent in the
    wearing of masks immortalizing European pagans, evil
    omens, celebrities and presidents of the United States.
    They can have their "Halloween," and its European
    concepts. The time has come for us as a raza of
    impregnable beliefs and Nahuatl faith to remove
    the masks of misconceptions and ruses, and once
    more behold the glorious days of Teotleco — the
    arrival of our gods, and to continue this celebration
    of remembrance for our future Mexika generations.

    El Día De Los Muertos will destroy the evil
    spirits that have strived to separate us. This
    day has the power to destroy the evil mindset that
    invaded us five hundred years ago, attempting to
    oppress, exploit and dehumanize our brothers and
    sisters.

    Rejoice with honor and courage, and celebrate
    El Día de los Muertos with your ancestors, family
    members, and friends. Pray, sing and dance the ancient
    dance of joy. With the spirits of those beloved in
    heaven and on earth, acknowledge that this gift
    bestowed upon us will give us the ancient warrior
    spirit of the land — the spirit of Mexicayotl!
    Rise with the spirits to the battle for the liberation
    of our God-given rights. We, the flowers of ancient
    indigenous roots, are the true heirs of Aztlan and
    of the land of Cem-Anahuac.

    "With joy and honor, I walk in communion with the
    ancient spirits. For tomorrow rises the Sixth Sun
    of the Mexika. We many not all be Mexika, but we
    can certainly claim a Mexika consciousness."

    Note: circulated via email by Irma L. Muniz (Oct. 25, 2005)
    ******************
    Editor’s Comment: I hear Muniz speaking as a shaman, rattling spirits
    with old eyes. He speaks to everyone of a real difference between
    a night of fright and a night of rejoicing, between a night where we
    run run run from death and a night when we celebrate the vast dead
    kingdom. To the extent therefore that I am able to laugh as
    deeply as the fright before me, I think Tezcatlipoca helps me to
    connect with the balancing act that the day of the dead calls
    out. To do that in the company of my own dead kingdom seems
    like good advice to take. To insist that nobody lose touch with
    one’s most authentic dead kingdom is not just cranky talk among the
    old. We have to find healthy ways of living with our own dead,
    but the health will do little good if none of the dead we learn to live
    with
    are our own.  On the other hand, wouldn’t it be worthwhile to
    welcome Aztec dead to the pagan party where we learn to fear and laugh
    together.

  • The Education of Angela Valenzuela: A Thanksgiving Memoir

    Note: Angela Valenzuela is an education activist with values that we
    respect. Here is a Thanksgiving note she recently shared with her list.
    Posted by permission of the author
    .–gm

    Dear Friends and Colleagues:

    I want to take this opportunity to share with listserv subscribers
    a little bit about me. This may be conveyed through a story that
    appeared today in the San Angelo Standard Times about my recently
    deceased mother, Helen Rios Valenzuela. (I’m from San Angelo, Texas).
    My Mom passed away last week and here’s the link to today’s story that I think is well done:

    There is only one error in the story. It says that my Mom is from
    Phoenix, Arizona, when she’s actually from Superior, Arizona. However,
    as a five year old, she did spend half a year alone in Phoenix in a
    children’s hospital specifically for polio victims. She definitely beat
    the odds. She wasn’t supposed to have ever walked and she did. She
    wasn’t supposed to have had any children and she had three. And as a
    female, Mexican American high school dropout who grew up during the Jim
    Crow segregation era (de facto segregation, for Mexican Americans), she
    was not supposed to have succeeded in life. In fact, my Mom graduated
    from college with very high honors. There’s a part of the story about my Mom deciding to go to college
    that I want to add. I was a senior in college when my Mom decided to go
    (she had already taken and passed her GED). Incidentally, it was really
    neat for me to cross paths with her daily during my senior year in
    college. She was always surrounded by young college people who sought
    her out. And I remember her bringing them home since our home was
    already a social and intellectual center where we discussed and
    questioned everything. And anyone who entered that space participated.

    My Mom possessed a unique ability to accept, respect, and be open to
    each person’s opinion and individuality. Since what always mattered
    most to her was the relationship, you could tell her anything. This
    certainly played an important role in my own development primarily
    because it freed me to follow my dreams.

    To continue, my Mom observed how by my junior year in college I was
    questioning so much of what I had grown up with and how I was changing
    as a consequence. I grew more distant as I felt that my parents could
    no longer relate to me as they had previously. All of this saddened my
    Mom as we had always had a close relationship. Several months after
    enrolling in college, she asked me if I knew why she had decided to go
    to college. I told her that I had an idea but wasn’t sure that I really
    knew. My Mom then told me that she had always cherished our
    relationship so much that she decided to go to college so that she
    wouldn’t lose me.

    I remember feeling amazed and profoundly flattered by her comment even as I attempted to grasp the strength of her love for me.

    We’ll miss my Mom this Thanksgiving, especially since it was her
    favorite holiday. We thought that she’d a least make it to
    Thanksgiving…. In any case, I’m thankful to my Mother for her
    unconditional love and passion for life.

    I share all of this because my Mother’s life and death have been
    very instructive to me, as well as to so many others. Perhaps this will
    be instructive to you as well. Please know that I, too, am well—as is
    my family.

    Peace,

    Angela Valenzuela

    P.S. There is a photo, obituary, and additional comments by me about my Mom on my blog at:
    http://texasedequity.blogspot.com/

  • Hispanic Orgs Write Bush against 'Mean-Spirited' Immigration Proposals

    Dear Mr. President:

    The undersigned national Latino organizations write to express our
    extreme disappointment with the Statement of Administration Policy
    (SAP) issued yesterday supporting the "Border Protection,
    Antiterrorism, and Illegal Immigration Control Act of 2005" (H.R.
    4437). This bill defies any attempt at serious or effective immigration
    reform, which you yourself acknowledged is urgently needed. Your SAP is
    baffling in light of recent statements made by RNC Chairman Ken
    Mehlman, which correctly
    point out that the House Republican proposal overreaches in ways which
    are harmful to the country and which will alienate the Latino
    community.
    Your support of H.R. 4437 is inconsistent with the very principles for immigration reform that you have put forward.
    The impact of H.R. 4437 on the Latino community would be
    devastating. This bill is excessively harmful to American
    families,
    businesses, and communities as well as immigrants. Among its many
    appalling provisions: it criminalizes 11 million undocumented workers;
    it subjects family members, employers, religious institutions, and
    others to criminal penalties under broadened definitions of smuggling,
    harboring, and transporting; it expands expedited removal and mandatory
    detention; and it creates an unworkable employer verification system
    that will
    displace millions of workers and disrupt the economy. All of these
    provisions will have a far-reaching impact on the entire Latino
    community, yet none would solve our very real immigration problems.
    H.R. 4437 does not put us on a path toward comprehensive immigration
    reform; rather it stymies
    constructive debate and is an affront to those who are truly
    interested in solutions.

    As you know, leaders from both political parties have
    acknowledged the need to address our immigration problems in a
    comprehensive manner and are working on realistic, rational immigration
    reform legislation.

    However, House Republicans have provided this shortsighted and
    mean-spirited bill which is intended to appear tough on immigration
    without resolving our nation’s immigration problems. Only a
    comprehensive approach that provides a path to citizenship for current
    undocumented immigrants, creates new legal channels for future flows of
    needed immigrants, reduces family immigration backlogs, and protects
    worker rights will reduce undocumented immigration and bring order to
    our immigration system.

    We are shocked and saddened by your Administration’s statement of
    strong support for H.R. 4437. It is difficult to understand how you
    will explain your posture on this legislation to the Latino community,
    which is following this debate very closely. We urge you to withdraw
    your support for H.R. 4437 and get back on the path toward
    comprehensive immigration reform.

    Sincerely,

    League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC)
    Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF)
    National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials (NALEO)
    Educational Fund
    National Council of La Raza (NCLR)

  • Affidavit of Michelle Borton

    Note: the affidavit of Schroeder’s car partner that night begins
    with descriptions of the drug operation surveillance and identification
    of a ‘light colored’ suburban vehicle that had been seen at he
    house. While Sgt. Doyle follows the suburban, Schroeder takes
    another route in an effort to head it off.

    I believe Officer Shroeder put our unit into reverse, onto S. Pleasant
    Valley and decided to initiate a stop on the vehicle as it stopped at
    the stop sign. Our emergency lights were activated and I believe
    I advised Sgt. Doyle on channel 6B. Officer Schroeder positioned
    our unit facing the SUV. I got out of our unit and approached the
    driver of the SUV with my hands free. It is important to note
    that I did not see Officer Schroeder get out of our vehicle and can not
    say whether she had her duty weapon in her hand at this time.
    While getting out of our unit, the front passenger got out and jumped
    over a wooden privacy fence approximately five feet to the south where
    the vehicle was stopped. I heard Officer Schroeder say something
    to the affect "Stop [C name withheld by editor]." I had my
    flashlight shining into the vehicle as I approached the driver. I
    began to give verbal commands to the driver to have him show his
    hands. During this time I saw the back right passenger. I
    immediately knew the subject to be Daniel Rocha and gave a verbal
    command for him to stay in the vehicle. I know Rocha from working
    Southeast Austin and have encountered/arrested him several times.
    Officer Schroeder and I spent 6/8/05 and this day 6/9/05 looking for
    Rocha as he was wanted for Felony Theft. While giving verbal
    command to Rocha and attempting to watch the driver, I saw Rocha open
    the back right door where he was sitting. As he got out of the
    vehicle, I immediately observed Officer Schroeder tangled up with him
    as it appeared that he was trying to move past her. This
    encounter is best described as Rocha attempting to run through
    her. I saw Sgt. Doyle run up and begin to assist Officer
    Schroeder. I could see them both attempting to gain control of
    Rocha, but were actively engaged in a physical fight on the opposite
    side of the vehicle. My field of view was limited, but it
    appeared at one time that all three were going down to the ground….

    Signed and notarized June 10, 2005

  • Rocha Docs: Summary Evaluation

    By Greg Moses

    Below are transcribed excerpts from the Rocha files released by the Travis County District Attorney’s office following an announcement that the Grand Jury had decided to issue no criminal indictments. Here are a few key phrases:

    • Rocha’s body was off to my left side but now he was on top of my boss. I could see Sgt. Doyle and Rocha fighting.–Julie Schroeder
    • he was still on his feet and struggling. I was hoping we could get him to the ground. At that time I heard a pop….–Schroeder’s boss
    • The path of the gunshot wound was back to front, left to right, and downward.–medical examiner
    • Probable body positions for the deceased include down on one or both knees or bent over at the waist.–Forensic consultant
    • I could see Julie standing to the east of an unknown male who was laying face down on the ground and Sgt. Doyle was on his knees on the west side of the subject–Backup Cop
    • I hear the guy say "weapon" but I didn’t see anything in his hands. I saw him get on his hands and knees and saw the female officer with her left hand trying to put him on the ground and she was kinda kneeling with her left hand and knee. I saw her with a gun in her right hand. I saw he was lying flat. I don’t know if the guy was fighting with the officer or resisting because I did not see that. I thought that the police were going to arrest him and put him up. I walked off back to my house but then I heard a shot….–Witness

    What to make of this sad, sad stack of docs? There is no question that Daniel Rocha had been a troubled kid and was making some poor choices in the first weeks of his adult life. He was very likely engaged in illegal activity of a not very unusual kind on the night he was killed. He was involving himself in petty drug dealing. From the testimony of friends and teachers, Daniel was a spirited character with an outlaw edge.

    The record shows that he was also doing things that anyone would call cops to stop, such as burglary or theft. But on the night of his death was he engaging in the kind of behavior that justified a killing? If he was no role model, he was also no monster, and no stack of previous behaviors attributed to him would warrant anything near a summary execution–not even in Texas.

    In this case, it appears from the evidence released by the grand jury that Officer Schroeder displayed a pattern of poor judgment in her impulsive decision to make the traffic stop and in her life or death determination to detain Rocha right then and there. Reports from her partner and her boss indicate that they were not quite prepared in advance for the ‘take down’ when she abruptly initiated it.

    The inability of Schroeder and her boss to contain Rocha even when double teaming him indicates that the ground was poorly chosen for this action. From the time Officer Schroeder threw her car into reverse, the tone for this tragedy was set. It is difficult to imagine that good cops would find this a worthy pattern of action.

    The expert report from Oklahoma indicates that the probable position of Daniel Rocha at the time of shooting was on one or two knees or bent over, with Officer Schroeder at arm’s length to his left. In other words, the probable positions confirm Officer Schroeder’s statement, that Rocha was not fighting her at the time of the shooting.

    Schroeder’s claim that Rocha was doing something more than trying to get away from her boss seems incredible when compared to her boss’ statement that he was hanging onto Rocha’s foot. So there is no question that Daniel Rocha was playing with fire in his gangsta attitude, but there is also an expectation that cops are trained to deal with such cases in ways that do not escalate into on-the-spot executions. I think that’s why they are called peace officers. To kids, especially teenage males, we have to suggest better things, but then again, we have to be pretty careful that we not pretend to have offered Daniel a well-chosen world to work with. When I think of the comment that he had a slight learning disability, then I can see how he was following the wrong crowd, he just wasn’t so quick as the one who first jumped the fence. A slight learning disability is all it would take for that moment of hesitation, then that moment of tragic motivation to follow his friend over the fence.

    Did Officer Schroeder raise a gun to that first escapee? No, she called him by name, just to let him know that she knew who he was and where to find him another day. He climbed a tree, waited, and lived to hear the shot. What was so different about Daniel that night?

    I don’t know if the Police Association intends to come off this way, but in their public comments about this mess, they seem to indicate that any resistance to police may very well justify deadly force. In other words, they want absolute authority in this life. If this is the message that the grand jury was trying to send–‘obey or die’–then the grand jury has run too far into police state mentality. Everyone has a role to play in breaking cycles of unfairness. Unfortunately, in these docs one finds too many trails of continuing evasion.