Category: Uncategorized

  • Fighting with the Brown Pelicans to Survive

    By David Swanson

    Way back in January, the ocean was still ocean, oil still oil, and combining the two had not yet occurred to us. The Conch Republic, the Florida Keys, was — in retrospect — a secure and pristine paradise.

    The danger was of sunburn, not of crude oil on your skin or toxic chemicals in the air you breathed.

    While I was there with my family, we enjoyed the sand, sun, and sea. But we wanted to see more pelicans. We wanted to see lots of pelicans.

    So we went to the Florida Keys Wild Bird Center.

    Well, it turns out that pelicans know what time it is. And if someone hands out buckets of fish on the shore at the same time every day, any pelican in the greater metropolitan area is going to be there right on time.

    And that’s what they do there on Tavernier Key. They know the pelicans. They tag them. They doctor injured ones. And, if they want to check on how they’re doing, all it takes is several buckets of fish and predictable timing.

    The pelicans didn’t have everything perfect, even pre-oil. The effects on the weather of our burning of oil we’re hitting the pelicans hard before the oil itself hit the water. These birds require a finely calibrated climate. They migrate from the U.S. gulf coast to the Keys with the seasons. And they need fish, fresh, healthy fish, and lots of it.

    When the weather goes freaky with unusually cold or hot or dry periods, and when fish die, the pelicans are in danger too. We just didn’t know how good they had it before BP-USA dipped them and their world in oil.

    At lunchtime, hundreds of pelicans show up with one thing on their minds.

    Pelicans Before the BP Oil Disaster

    If you watch CNN you’ll see heartwarming stories of how purchasing the proper brand of dishwashing soap at your local supermarket will contribute to the work of washing the pelicans off before dipping them back in the oil to die. Not to put too fine a point on it, this is horseshit.

    The ocean is filling up with oil, which kills the fish, which kills the pelicans, and which — with a few more steps — kills all of us. The pelicans are canaries in this coalmine, and they are expiring.

    There will be no more human enjoyment of the pelicans if this continues, and no more pelican enjoyment of anything at all. They will be gone, along with the world they lived in.

    This does not strike me as yet another ho-hum project for the president to create a commission on or the oil baron primarily responsible to be annoyed by when he’s not yachting in another ocean. This is the worst damage we have yet imposed on the earth, an ongoing explosion of black liquid death pumping into paradise, and we’re taking it all pretty coolly.

    Oh, but what can we do?

    What would the pelicans do? When they want something, they don’t hesitate. If you don’t toss them the fish fast enough, they grab your legs. If that doesn’t work, they try to knock the bucket over. These are birds on a mission to survive. We’re on a mission to nap.

    What should we be doing? Not yachting. Not golfing. Not deferring as people to our government or as Congress to a president or as that president to the criminals responsible.

    There should be an all-out night-and-day effort to stop this oil gusher. The national guard should be brought home to guard the nation. The trillions of dollars being put into wars for oil should be reinvested (ending the wars) into a war against the oil we do not want and cannot survive, and into an all-out crusade to create a renewable energy economy.

    The oil should be claimed by our nation, and our nation should seize the assets of the company responsible.

    The state of Delaware should decharter the US branch of BP.

    BP and the government regulators who did not regulate it should be prosecuted.

    The military and the rest of the government should end all contracts with BP.

    All offshore drilling should be banned.

    All restrictions on journalists in the Gulf of Mexico should be lifted.

    Corporations should be denied their dangerous status of possessing the privileges of people with none of the responsibilities.

    If anyone should be given the protections afforded flesh and blood people, it is the pelicans.

    * * * * * *

    David Swanson is the author of the new book “Daybreak: Undoing the Imperial Presidency and Forming a More Perfect Union” by Seven Stories Press. You can order it and find out when tour will be in your town.

    To receive updates from After Downing Street register here.

  • Two Stepping on Tiny Tim

    In a perfect world the health insurance industry would be liquidated overnight, replaced by a universal care fund, aka single payer. But until last week, the reason for abolition wasn’t so clearly phrased by the insurance industry itself. Now they say it plain: “You can’t make us cover Tiny Tim.”

    If the insurance industry wants to boast that it can cut Tiny Tim out of its future, then it should expect the righteous judgment that falls upon the head of each and every Scroogelike creature–a lonesome and cold gravestone. Nor should we forget to pick their corporate pockets thoroughly as we ready their legacies for the burial that their recent history so richly deserves.

    For a day or two anyway, Washington danced enthusiastically with the profiteering managers of our health care economy. And from a distance it looked like a partnership that had half a chance. Then the creeps started whispering little things in Washington’s ear.

    But situations like this are what elbows are made for, and it would be interesting to see who would vote against a little old law of one sentence only. “Any insurance company who refuses to cover a child will forfeit all of its assets immediately to the US Treasury.”

    Oh, and “God bless us all, every one!”–gm

  • Rio Grande Activists Call for Moratorium on Clayton Williams, Jr. Water Plan

    On the Mexico side of the international boundary, the Rio Grande has historically been called the Rio Bravo. In this appeal, we refer to this 1885-mile long international river as the Rio Grande-Rio Bravo.

    The watershed of the Rio Grande-Rio Bravo covers eight states in our two countries. In the United States, that would include Colorado, New Mexico,and Texas. In Mexico the watershed includes Durango, Chihuahua, Coahuila, Nuevo Leon, and Tamaulipas.

    For their agricultural, industrial, commercial,and residential existence, millions of US citizens and millions of Mexican citizens have historically relied on the natural hydrological flows of the Rio Grande-Rio Bravo and its tributaries, from its headwaters in the Colorado Rockies all the way to its mouth as it flows into the Gulf of Mexico.

    Due to drought, just a few years ago, the waters of the Rio Grande-Rio Bravo dried up before it could reach the Gulf.

    In this era of global climate change, the likelihood of more drought seems imminent. In this past year Texas just came out of a period of the worst drought on record. Yet, new threats are looming on the horizon for the Rio Grande-Rio Bravo, especially on the Texas-Mexico portion of the river.

    The Mexico side of the border is the fastest growing region in Mexico. Similarly, the Texas side of the Rio Grande-Rio Bravo is the fastest growing region in the United States. Such growth will continue to put a lot of added pressure on the waters of the Rio Grande-Rio Bravo, both in the terms of consumption as well as contamination.

    As it is, according to American Rivers, the Rio Grande-Rio Bravo is one of the most endangered rivers in North America. According the World Wildlife Fund, the Rio Grande-Rio Bravo is the seventh most endangered river in the world.

    The newest endangerment to the Rio Grande-Rio Bravo is upon us. This threat is somewhat stealth, as it is under the radar of most state, federal and international agencies and organizations. For over a century, the State of Texas has regulated its waters based on the archaic “rule of capture,” or “right of capture.” Essentially, the biggest pump and pumper owns the water that can be extracted.

    Based on this “rule”, an application has been made by a private party to extract 47,000 acre feet per year out of the Rio Grande-Rio Bravo watershed. An acre foot is equal to roughly 326,000 gallons of water.

    The application is from Clayton Williams, Jr.’s Fort Stockton Holdings to the Middle Pecos County Groundwater Conservation District (MPGCD). The application proposes to extract 41,000,000 gallons of water a day, or about 15,000,000,000 gallons of water per year–for 30 plus years–out of the Rio Grande-Rio Bravo watershed.

    If approved, the permit would allow 45,000,000,000,000 gallons of water to be taken out of the Rio Grande-Rio Bravo watershed as a result of this one application alone. Others will follow. The preliminary hearing will be held this coming Tuesday, April 20, 2010, in Fort Stockton. The final decision will be rendered on May 18, 2010.

    With all this in mind, the Rio Grande International Study Center (RGISC), a non-profit organization based at the Laredo Community College on the banks of the Rio Grande-Rio Bravo, along with our sister organization in Mexico, el Centro Internacional del los Estudios del Rio Bravo (CIER), has allied with the City of Fort Stockton.

    We are also allying with not only the citizens of Pecos County but also the millions of citizens of the international community who reside within and depend upon the Rio Grande-Rio Bravo for their existence. On their behalf, we are appealing to US Congressmen to help us prevent such an unprecedented action that would be taken without adequate science.

    We request that Congressmen please utilize your office and position of authority to call for a moratorium on any extraction of waters from the Rio Grande-Rio Bravo watershed. Approval of such extraction of billions of gallons of water a year should NOT be granted.

    There is a need for time, time for an adequate hydrological study to be performed that would reveal what impact such a diversion away from the international watershed would have. Our concern is that there is insufficient science that would show the impact on the natural hydrological cycle of the Rio Grande-Rio Bravo watershed, on which millions of bi-national citizens downriver depend.

    Under the 1944 Treaty with Mexico, the waters of Fort Stockton and Pecos County, Texas, are within the geographical boundaries of the International Boundary and Water Commission (IBWC). Never before has a massive amount of water been extracted and transferred out of the watershed and IBWC boundaries. This is a precedent-setting case. How would this impact the spirit and intent of the 1944 treaty?

    The City of Fort Stockton is a small community of some 7,500 population. The total population of Pecos County is about 20,000. Alone, they are hard-pressed to handle the magnitude of this challenge. The residents there already have a historic natural spring, Comanche Springs, that is dried up most of the year due to high impact pumping of the aquifer for irrigation by the same businessman who now wishes to export water out of the watershed to Midland, Texas, for profit.

    Find below a resolution drafted by the City Council of the City of Fort Stockton. Together , the City Council and RGISC appeal to you to intervene and prevent, this dangerous hydrological precedent. If this permit is allowed, others will follow. Diverting Rio Grande-Rio Bravo waters away from almost ten million inhabitants within the IBWC boundaries would be to divert water away from the fastest growing region in our two countries that already depends on this river.

    This action is being done for one entity’s profit. It is also being done so that other areas outside the Rio Grande-Rio Bravo watershed region could experience economic growth. That such an action would jeopardize the growth along the border seems discriminatory against those who live on the US-Mexico border.

    We are also writing the IBWC, the Council on Environmental Quality-Office of the White House, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of the Interior, US Fish and Wildlife, the Army Corps of Engineers, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, the Texas Water Development Board, and Texas Parks and Wildlife.

    We are writing all the members of Congress who have border districts. We are writing the Governor of the State of Texas as well as all the members of our Texas Legislature that represent the border.

    In Mexico, we are writing the Comision Internacional de los Limites y Agua, Comision Nacional del Agua, Secretaria de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturals, and the governors of the five states within the Rio Grande-Rio Bravo watershed.

    Editor’s Note: Article adapted from letter to Congressman Cuellar from Jay J. Johnson-Castro, Sr., Executive Director of the Rio Grande International Study Center–gm

    RESOLUTION NO. 1O-111R

    A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT STOCKTON JOINING FORCES WITH THE RIO GRANDE INTERNATIONAL STUDY CENTER IN ITS PLEA FOR A MORATORIUM & INTERVENTION TO PREVENT WATER FROM BEING TRANSPORTED, EXPORTED OR PUMPED FROM THE PECOS RIVER AND RIO GRANDE RIVER WATERSHEDS & REQUESTING THAT A HYDROLOGICAL STUDY BE PERFORMED OF THE SUBTERRANEAN WATER FLOWS OF THE EDWARDS-TRINITY AQUIFER TO DETERMINE WHAT UNFORESEEN ADVERSE IMPACTS COULD OCCUR ON THE FLOW OF WATER INTO THE INTERNATIONAL BODY WATER OF WHICH MILLIONS OF INHABITANTS IN THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY DEPEND ON FOR EXISTENCE.

    WHEREAS, The Pecos River is an integral part of the Rio Grande watershed, which is an
    international body of water under the 1944 treaty between the United States and Mexico; and

    WHEREAS, Downriver from the mouth of the Pecos River in confluence with the Rio Grande is
    an internatio
    nal comm
    unity of some 6-10 million inhabitants that solely rely on the Rio Grande as
    a source of existence; residential, commercial, industrial and agricultural usage; and

    WHEREAS, Pecos County is confronted with an enterprise that is attempting to extract
    approximately 15 billion gallons of water per year from the Pecos watershed under the Texas “rule
    of capture”; and

    WHEREAS, If successful, that would become a precedent for other water marketing enterprises;
    and

    WHEREAS, The Rio Grande International Study Center is a non-profit organization with the
    stewardship of protecting the Rio Grande watershed; and

    WHEREAS, The board of directors of the RGISC has voted unanimously to support Fort
    Stockton in attempting to protect the Pecos River watershed; and

    WHEREAS, RGISC and the City of Fort Stockton will jointly submit correspondence to the
    International Boundary and Water Commission (IBWC), Environmental Protection Agency,
    Comision Internacional de los Lirnites y Agua (CILA), CONAGUA (Comision Nacional del
    Agua), SEMARNAT (Secretaria de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturals), Texas Water
    Development Board (TWDB), Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ), along with
    the four Congressional representatives from Texas bordering Mexico; Congressman Silvestre
    Reyes (Dist. 16), Congressman Ciro Rodriguez (Dist. 23), Congressman Henry Cuellar (Dist. 28)
    and Congressman Solomon Ortiz (Dist. 27); and

    WHEREAS, A request will be sought for a moratorium and an intervention regarding plans to
    transfer, export or pump water out of, along with the protection of, the Pecos River and Rio
    Grande River watersheds until additional hydrological studies of the subterranean water flows of
    the Edwards-Trinity aquifer can be made to determine what unforeseen adverse impacts could
    occur on the flow of water into the international body water of which millions of inhabitants in the
    international community depend on for existence; and

    WHEREAS, Input will also be solicited from the Texas Parks and Wildlife, National Parks
    Service, US Fish and Wildlife, as well as other local, state, national and international organizations
    and agencies; and

    WHEREAS, A joint press conference will be held to inform the media about our request for
    intervention; and

    – – NOW THEREFFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE FORT STOCKTON CITY COUNCIL,
    THAT IT HEREBY ENDORSES:
    JOINING FORCES WITH THE RIO GRANDE
    INTERNATIONAL STUDY CENTER IN ITS PLEA FOR A
    MORATORIUM & INTERVENTION TO PREVENT WATER
    FROM BEING TRANSPORTED, EXPORTED OR PUMPED
    FROM THE PECOS RIVER AND RIO GRANDE RIVER
    WATERSHEDS & REQUESTING THAT A HYDROLOGICAL
    STUDY BE PERFORMED OF THE SUBTERRANEAN WATER
    FLOWS OF THE EDWARDS-TRINITY AQUIFER TO
    DETERMINE WHAT UNFORESEEN ADVERSE IMPACTS
    COULD OCCUR ON THE FLOW OF WATER INTO THE
    INTKRNATIONAL BODY WATER OF WIllCR MILLIONS OF
    INHAB1.TA.””I!TS IN THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY
    DEPEND ON FOR EXISTENCE.

    PASSED AND APPRGYED by the Fort Stockton City Council on this 23rd day of February,
    2010.

  • Mormons for Racial Profiling?

    Unsustainable Contradictions in Immigration Law

    CounterPunch / DissidentVoice / TheRagBlog

    By Greg Moses

    What’s up with the Mormons? Orem, Utah legislator Stephen Eric Sandstrom last week pledged to follow the lead of “my friend” Arizona State Senator Russell Pearce and expand the number of states with show-me-your-papers bills aiming to criminalize, jail, and deport irregular migrants.

    Rep. Sandstrom, who is a graduate of Brigham Young University and a former Mormon missionary to Venezuela, takes credit for co-founding a state’s rights organization called the Patrick Henry Caucus.

    Sandstrom’s “friend” Sen. Pearce of Arizona, sponsor of the recently signed SB-1070, hails from the Mormon stronghold of Mesa and claims to be the mastermind behind Maricopa County’s infamous Tent City Jail.

    For Pearce and Sandstrom, the crucial issue of liberty in the 21st Century would appear to involve the rights of states in relation to the federal government of the USA–never mind the rights of individual people who reside in those states.

    What’s curious about this particular Pearce-Sandstrom movement for state’s rights over individual rights is how it seems to contradict the interests of the Mormon family itself, which has been witnessing an increase in Spanish-speaking congregations.

    Last summer, Salt Lake Tribune writer Peggy Fletcher Stack reported increasing fears among Spanish-speaking members of the Mormon Church of Latter- day Saints (LDS) who were concerned about travel restrictions they were facing for missionary work and then-impending implementation of Utah’s anti-migrant law, SB-81. “People are very scared,” said one woman via translator.

    “Other than for its missionaries, the LDS Church takes a ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ approach toward the immigration status of its members,” reported Fletcher Stack. “But some estimate between 50 percent and 75 percent of members in Utah’s 104 Spanish-speaking congregations are undocumented. That includes many bishops, branch presidents, even stake presidents.”

    Salt Lake City Police Chief Chris Burbank declared that Utah’s SB-81 would require illegal racial profiling, so he openly refused to enforce the self-contradictory statute. Last week Chief Burbank “blasted” Arizona’s SB-1070, telling KSL NewsRadio talk-show host Doug Wright: “This sets law enforcement back 30 to 40 years.”

    Mormon Times Columnist Jerry Earl Johnston shook his head last year in dismay over the unwisdom of the Utah anti-migrant legislation:

    “I can only speak from my own LDS experience here, but I hold Utah lawmakers responsible for breaking up good LDS families and forcing young American citizens out of their native land,” wrote Johnston, predicting that victory would not reward the shortsighted anti-migrant forces.

    “I could see these Hispanic brethren were going to win,” wrote Johnston. “I could see their faith, resilience and strength. They wanted to be in Utah more than Utah lawmakers wanted them out. They had weathered tribulations with good humor and without malice toward those who persecuted them.”

    Meanwhile, in the Mormon stronghold of Mesa, Arizona, represented by SB-1070 sponsor Sen. Pearce, the number of Spanish-speaking LDS congregations had grown from five to 13 between 2002 and 2007 according to East Valley Tribune reporter Sarah N. Lynch.

    Last fall, official LDS printing presses in Salt Lake City ran off an approved Spanish-language edition of the Mormon Bible–“The Santa Biblia: Reina-Valera 2009 (Publicada por La Iglesia de Jesucristo de los Santos de los Últimos Días Salt Lake City, Utah, E.U.A.)–with an initial press run of 800,000 copies.

    “It is one of the most significant scripture projects ever undertaken by the Church,” proclaimed a notice of Sept. 14, 2009 posted at lds.org. “The volume contains new chapter headings, footnotes and cross-references to all scriptures used by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.” Announcement of the volume was reportedly shared among “thousands of Spanish-speaking Latter-day Saints congregations.”

    Mormon political leaders, like everyone else in today’s global economy, are confronting a real crisis in human welfare. Maricopa County in particular is a frontline disaster zone for the crisis in real estate values, mortgage defaults, unemployment, and revenue shortfalls.

    “In Maricopa,” according to an April report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics on Q3 2009 unemployment, “every private industry group except education and health services experienced an employment decline, with construction experiencing the largest decline (-32.2 percent).”

    Crisis reveals character. So when Mormon political leaders campaign for agendas of states’ rights according to Patrick Henry rhetorics of “liberty or death,” perhaps their Spanish-speaking LDS brethren can remind them that there are millions of people of goodwill in need of actual freedom-loving legislators in whatever state they have freely chosen to congregate and build up.

  • Archiving the Texas School Debate

    The following reports by Zahira Torres from the Austin bureau of the El Paso Times are the best we’ve seen when it comes to alertness in reporting on the cultural history known as the Texas school curriculum debates.–gm

    AUSTIN — Tension and bitterness continued to divide the State Board of Education on Thursday (March 11, 2010) as more conservative Republicans on the board wielded their voting power to tweak social studies curriculum for about 4.7 million public school children.

    The majority of white Republicans on the 15-member board shot down measures on race relations that upset some Hispanic and African-American members of the board.

    They also voted down a measure that would have taught children the significance of the separation of church and state.

    Then they won battles to insert religion into more areas of the curriculum, deleted a reference they believed would allow students to learn about people with alternative lifestyles and replaced the word “Democratic” with the phrase “constitutional republic” in references to U.S. government.

    The board for months has debated social studies curriculum and should reach a preliminary vote today. The board then will accept public comments, add more amendments and take a final vote in May.

    The curriculum will guide what children in Texas public schools learn over the next decade. It has a broader-reaching effect because Texas is one of the largest purchasers of textbooks and often publishers use similar criteria to craft books for other states.

    On Thursday, members labored into the evening over phrases, historic figures and what reflected socially accepted ideals. They removed and added Hispanics on the list of figures to study.

    While there were moments of agreement, Democrats in the minority often expressed frustration over what they considered the “whitewashing” of history.

    Those tensions boiled over when the board added Lawrence Sullivan “Sul” Ross and John Nance Garner IV as figures who influenced Texas history.

    Board member Mary Helen Berlanga, D-Corpus Christi, walked out of the meeting, saying that she no longer felt her voice would be heard.

    “We can just pretend that this is White America and Hispanics don’t exist,” she said as she walked out.

    Earlier in the meeting, Berlanga proposed adding two Hispanics and an African-American as examples of Medal of Honor recipients to world history, but that motion failed. Members agreed to revisit the issue when they discussed U.S. history.

    A similar motion passed later that evening. It called for students to learn about Medal of Honor recipients of all races, then offered the names of a Hispanic man, a black man and a white man as examples.

    The board deleted an item in sociology courses that required students to “explain how institutional racism is evident in America.”

    They removed references to “Tejano leaders” who died at the Alamo. And in a separate measure they added a reference to Hispanics involved in the fight at the Alamo but did not make it a requirement.

    David Bradley, R-Beaumont, said he heard “the one Tejano leader who was there left before the fight.”

    They struck hip-hop from a list of genres of music through a proposal by outgoing conservative Republican board member Don McLeroy, a dentist from College Station.

    The genre had made the cut in January despite efforts to remove it from the list after board members argued that, like it or not, it influenced society.

    They also argued over another amendment proposed by McLeroy.

    That amendment sought to insert wording requiring students to “analyze the effectiveness of the adversarial approach taken by many civil rights groups versus the philosophical persuasive tone of Dr. Martin Luther King.”

    Lawrence Allen, D-Fresno, questioned what defined a group’s approach as adversarial. He requested that someone on the board give examples documented in history.

    He asked whether they were considered adversarial “because they did not take the philosophy of ‘I’ll let you hit me and I won’t hit you back’?”

    Eventually the word “adversarial” was replaced with “groups such as the Black Panthers.” Another part of the amendment that mentioned minorities’ “unrealistic expectations for equal outcomes” was deleted after a board member raised concerns.

    Democrats slightly gained ground.

    El Paso astronaut Danny Olivas and Raymond L. Telles, an El Pasoan who was the first Hispanic mayor of a major city, were added at the recommendation of board member Rune Nuñez, D-El Paso.

    Board member Mavis Knight, D-Dallas, successfully lobbied to add Rosa Parks as a leader who influenced the civil-rights movement.

    Knight lost another battle that would have required the curriculum to examine the reasons “why the founding fathers protected religious freedom by barring the government from promoting or disfavoring any particular religion above all others.”

    Her motion was shot down after Cynthia Dunbar, R-Richmond, argued that it was historically inaccurate.

    “One of the things we keep getting pounded about is injecting religion into the curriculum, and we’re not,” Dunbar said. “We don’t want our religious history to be painted and drawn from a viewpoint that is not historically accurate.”

    Despite protests from the minority members on the board, Republican member Barbara Cargill also won support for her proposal to delete a passage that required students to “differentiate between sex and gender as social constructs and determine how gender and socialization interact.”

    Cargill said she was concerned after using “the Google” to search the phrase. She said it could lead to students learning about “transvestites, transsexuals and who knows what else.”

    Allen and Knight argued that students should be able to learn about what is happening around them and that hiding it from them would be naive.

    “It is no secret to them so you might as well bring it out into the open and discuss it,” Knight said.

    Earlier this month McLeroy and Geraldine Miller lost their Republican primary elections.

    McLeroy and other conservatives have vowed to leave their mark on the curriculum.

    He said that they have been unfairly labeled as against the inclusion of minority groups.

    “We want to get a good balance that includes significant people into history books of all ethnicities,” he said.

    Berlanga disagreed.

    “You have a little bloc of right-wingers who lost their races and are bitter,” she said, adding that “a dentist,” a “housewife” and an “insurance guy” were rewriting history.

    She said that if things did not improve, the Legislature should dissolve the board.

    “We have lost it,” she said. “Lost the real history. Lost the true history.”


    AUSTIN — Texas schoolchildren could soon be learning a more conservative version of history.

    The State Board of Education took a preliminary vote Friday on changes to curriculum that will guide instruction for Texas’ 4.7 million public school children over the next decade.

    Ten of the board’s Anglo Republican members voted to approve revisions to proposed curriculum standards after three days of squabbling over race relations, religion in schools, and sex and gender in social studies classes.

    That left the five Hispanic and African-American Democrats on the board feeling frustrated and deflated.

    Right-wing conservatives on the board needed only to sway one of the more moderate Republicans to pass measures that called for students to identify reasons for limiting the role of government, incorporating more mentions of religion into the curriculum and replacing the words “Democratic republic” with the phrase “constitutional republic” in references to U.S. government.

    The conservative faction handily defeated an amendment that would have required children to learn the significance of the separation of church and stat
    e
    and rejected several attempts to include more minorities in the curriculum.

    The board will have to accept more public comments and could make additional changes through amendments before members take a final vote in May.

    From there, the approved curriculum will be used to develop textbooks. This could have a national impact because publishers at times use similar criteria to craft books for other states.

    The process to replace textbooks every six years costs the state hundreds of millions of dollars whether the curriculum standards are new or old, officials said. Texas Education Agency officials still do not know how the state’s budget crunch will affect their purchasing power.

    Friday, conservative members shot down two final attempts to reinsert references to minorities that were deleted by board members the previous night.

    So Democratic board mem bers Mavis Knight, Mary Helen Berlanga, Lawrence Allen and Rick Agosto cast protest votes.

    “I cannot go back to my community and say to them that I participated in perpetuating a fraud on the students of this state,” Knight said as she explained why she voted against the measure.

    Knight, D-Dallas, said the board allowed the battle between conservatism and liberalism to take over.

    She said board members “manipulated” the curriculum to offer changes without thinking about the effects on students.

    Rene Nuñez, El Paso’s representative on the board, first voted in favor of approving the revisions to the curriculum because he had won inclusion for El Pasoans Danny Olivas, an astronaut, and Raymond L. Telles, the first Hispanic mayor of a major city.

    He later changed his vote to show solidarity with other Democrats on the board.

    “The Democrats lost this round,” Nuñez said. “We made some gains, but in the big picture of things, we lost.”

    On the other end, conservative Republicans claimed victory for their constituents and said they performed a service that kept the state independent of national standards.

    Conservatives on the panel replaced the word “capitalism” in textbooks with “free enterprise system,” and they successfully argued that sixth-graders need to identify reasons for limiting the power of government. Limited governments are often a rallying cry for conservative members of the GOP.

    The faction voted down a proposal from Berlanga, D-Corpus Christi, to include world history lessons that focused on other acts of terrorism not related to Muslims.

    She said she wanted students to know that Native Americans died at the hands of the U.S. calvary and that Mexican-Americans were targeted by the Texas Rangers.

    Democrats and some moderate Republicans said the board was steering away from the initial advice of teachers and experts.

    But Terri Leo, R-Spring, said experts could debate both sides.

    “Just because a few — and I mean a few — of your amendments did not pass, then all of a sudden you are going to throw out this entire document,” she said.

    The majority on the board did not give up ground even when more-moderate members of their party attempted to compromise on issues.

    In one instance, Democrats tried to bring back references to hip-hop. They said the Beat Generation, which remained in the curriculum, could also be considered offensive.

    Some Republicans on the board said they would support the inclusion of both genres.

    But when the issue came to a vote, the more conservative faction kept references to the Beat Generation and successfully lobbied against hip-hop music.

    Leo tried to pass out explicit lyrics to a Ludacris song, while defending the Beat era.

    She was asked to stop by the board chairwoman Gail Lowe, R-Lampasas, but, after the vote, walked around handing out copies and making her case.

    Democrats on the board said that textbooks should include more references to minorities as the state’s demographics continue to change the makeup of Texas.

    About 2.3 million Texas public school children are Hispanic, and the number is expected to keep growing.

    Conservatives, though, eliminated Hispanics such as artist Santa Barraza. She was removed because conservatives disagreed with a painting they found on Google that showed a woman with bare breasts.

    Berlanga walked out of the meeting Thursday night to protest the conservative faction on the board. She said it has “whitewashed” the proposed curriculum so that it does not truly teach students about their history.

    Republicans on the board said they have included more minorities than ever before.

    Berlanga and Nuñez proposed amendments that would have called for students to identify Tejanos who died at the Alamo. They were denied.

    Board member Patricia Hardy, R-Fort Worth, said students should not be required to single out individuals who served as part of a larger group.

    “They were just among the other people who died at the Alamo,” she said.

    Berlanga asked what made Davy Crockett and Jim Bowie more important than Tejano fighters.


    We also clip these passages from reports by Terrence Stutz at the Dallas Morning News–gm

    Minority board members, who have called for the inclusion of more blacks and Hispanics among the historical figures to be covered, lost one vote Wednesday when the Republican majority deleted from the list an archbishop from El Salvador. Oscar Romero was assassinated in 1980 for speaking out against the country’s repressive government.

    Romero was included in the standards for world history until the board decided otherwise, saying he was not significant enough.

    Board Chairwoman Gail Lowe, R-Lampasas, told board members that nearly 14,000 e-mails have been received from people and groups wanting to have a say on the new standards.

    Among the amendments proposed by social conservatives and adopted Thursday were requirements that students understand how taxes and regulations restrict private enterprise, and that students analyze the importance of the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. Gun rights were given the same importance as free speech rights.

    The board agreed to strengthen nods to Christianity by adding references to “laws of nature and nature’s God” to a section in U.S. history that requires students to explain major political ideas.


    The Austin American-Statesman appended the following notes to a story by Kate Alexander–gm

    The State Board of Education considered about 300 amendments during 22 hours of deliberation over social studies curriculum standards. Here is a roundup of some of the significant changes, additions and deletions to the standards:

    Civil rights movement

    Don McLeroy, R-Bryan, proposed a wholesale rewrite of the handling of the civil rights movement in the high school U.S. history course to reflect “both sides of the story as opposed to a single, politically correct view.”

    Among his recommended revisions was a reference to the changes and events that resulted from the movement, “including increased participation of minorities in the political process and unrealistic expectations for equal outcomes.”

    The board eliminated the “unrealistic expectations” phrase with McLeroy’s assent.

    America is Exceptional

    “The United States is an exceptional nation. Most Americans would not regard that as a controversial statement. And there is good reason for that: it is true,” McLeroy wrote to justify adding a section on American Exceptionalism.

    The section in the high school U.S. government standards will explore why American values are unique from those of other nations and touch on Alexis de Tocqueville’s five values crucial to America’s success as a democratic republic.

    Words Matter

    In all grades, most references to “capitalism” were eliminated. The term has a negative connotation, said Ken Mercer, R-San Antonio. Instead, the U.S. econo
    mic
    system is defined throughout as a “free enterprise” system.

    The standards were once littered with references to the U.S. as a democracy. No more. In an early draft, the U.S became a “democratic republic” but now will be termed a “constitutional republic,” as suggested by Cynthia Dunbar, R-Richmond.

    American “imperialism” in an early draft of the high school U.S. history standards became “expansionism” because the original term projected an inaccurately negative view of American policy, McLeroy said. He offered a similar explanation for striking the word “propaganda” in reference to America’s entry into World War I.

    The Middle East

    High school world history students will be expected to “explain how Arab rejection of the State of Israel has led to ongoing conflict” and no longer will be asked to “explain the origins and impact of the Israeli-Palestininan conflict on global politics,” per amendments from McLeroy.


    The New York Times grabbed these details–gm

    References to Ralph Nader and Ross Perot are proposed to be removed, while Stonewall Jackson, the Confederate general, is to be listed as a role model for effective leadership, and the ideas in Jefferson Davis’s inaugural address are to be laid side by side with Abraham Lincoln’s speeches.