Legacy Admissions Questioned at Texas A&M

Jan. 3, 2004, 7:42PM
Legislators slam A&M over legacy admissions
Role of

family ties in acceptance called `institutional racism’
By TODD ACKERMAN
Copyright 2004

Houston Chronicle

Blood ties to alumni, sometimes known as the other affirmative action,

are the deciding factor in the admission of more than 300 white Texas A&M University freshmen annually,

according to data provided by the school. Such students — known as “legacy admits” — equal

roughly the overall total of blacks admitted to A&M each year. Only a handful of black students a year

are admitted because of legacy points.

“That’s a lot of kids being advantaged because

A&M is where mommy and daddy went,” said state Rep. Garnet Coleman, D-Houston. “Clearly, if you want

to go to A&M, it pays to be a legacy applicant rather than black. I wonder why no one’s sued it on

those grounds.”

Legacy preference programs are receiving new attention as the nation’s

universities reassess admissions policies in the aftermath of last spring’s U.S. Supreme Court ruling

that race may be an admissions factor on a case-by-case basis. U.S. Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass.,

recently filed a bill to require colleges to disclose the race and economic status of first-year

students related to alumni, and Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards has called for an end to

college legacy programs.

A&M’s program is drawing particular fire because university

President Robert Gates recently announced the university, now free from a court ruling prohibiting

racial preferences, won’t consider race in admissions. Coleman and other black legislators cited a

seeming contradiction between Gates’ rhetoric that students be admitted strictly because of merit and

a program they say perpetuates class distinction and white advantage.

Gates, president

for 1 1/2 years, said he doesn’t have a gut-level feeling about legacies, much less a thought-out one,

because he inherited the program and knows little about it. He said a task force will study its

future.

The task force won’t operate in a vacuum. State Rep. Lon Burnam, D-Fort Worth,

said he plans to file legislation to end A&M’s program, as early as this spring if a special session

is called. Burnam filed such bills twice before, but both died in committee.

Burnam said

that because the data show so few minorities benefit from legacy preferences, he believes the school

orchestrated protests of his bill by minorities during legislative hearings on one of his bills in

2001.

“I have never been as angry at state employees as I was at A&M’s during those

hearings,” Burnam said. “Even then, I knew in my gut they were using minority kids to continue a

program that reflects the past, meaning the institutional racism of the 20th century, rather than the

future, which will be majority African American and Hispanic.”

Typically, anywhere from

1,650 to more than 2,000 A&M applicants a year receive legacy points, so called because they reward the

grandchildren, children or siblings of A&M graduates. Such applicants receive 4 points on a 100-point

scale that also takes into account such factors as class rank, test scores, extracurricular activities,

community service and others.

Most A&M applicants admitted with legacy points don’t

need them to get in. But in 2003, 312 whites were admitted who wouldn’t have been without their alumni

ties. In 2002, that figure was 321.

The legacy program was the difference for six blacks

and 27 Hispanics in 2003, and three blacks and 25 Hispanics in 2002.

A&M officials noted

that minority legacies are usually admitted at roughly the same rates as white legacies. They also

stressed that having legacy points is no guarantee of being admitted.

“I wish I had the

numbers for how many applicants with legacy points don’t get in,” said Frank Ashley, A&M’s acting

assistant provost for enrollment. “There are roughly as many of them. I know because I hear from

alumni parents when their kid’s application is rejected.”

Although A&M announced in

early December it won’t consider race in admissions, Gates is pledging a greater commitment to

recruiting minorities. Having already created a high-ranking position in the school’s administration

to oversee diversity efforts, Gates says he will create scholarships for students who come from lower-

income families and beef up outreach efforts to large urban areas.

Legacy programs date

to the 19th century, but they became more widespread in the early 20th century as universities became

more selective. Ostensibly instituted to reward alumni support, they had the effect of limiting

enrollment of Jews and other minorities.

Today, nearly all selective private

universities and some public universities give an edge to legacies, largely to boost alumni giving.

Rice is among Texas’ private universities that take into account alumni ties — it has no point system

— but A&M is the state’s only public school with such a program.

The largest legacy

population nationally is at Notre Dame, where sons and daughters of alumni comprise 23 percent of the

student population. They’re more than 10 percent at most elite private schools, including Harvard,

Yale and Princeton.

At most top schools, legacy students are accepted at two or three

times the rate of other applicants. Massachusetts’ Amherst College, for example, accepts nearly half

of alumni children who apply, compared with 17 percent of all applicants.

Because they

aren’t racially discriminatory on their face, legacy preferences are considered less vulnerable to

legal challenge than affirmative action. Politically, though, their fates seem inextricably

linked.

The University of Georgia, for instance, scrapped its legacy program after a

circuit court struck down its affirmative action program. Critics cite studies that suggest alumni

offspring score lower on admission tests. And legacy students sometimes describe an “uneasiness”

about how they’re perceived similar to that described by minorities.

But “unlike race,

which is predominantly a proxy for disadvantage, legacy admissions are an attribute of advantage,”

University of Houston law professor Michael Olivas wrote in an article in the latest edition of the

educational journal CASE Currents. “They typically come from well-educated families and therefore are

privy to many economic, educational and other psychosocial benefits.”

Ashley counters

that A&M’s admission categories include one that gives points for an applicant’s parents’ lack of

education — up to 6 points if neither parent finished high school. That balances it out, he

said.

Although they also say legacy programs build a sense of community, most schools

are candid about acknowledging that long-term financial support is the primary reason for preferences.

Ashley said alumni parents of rejected applicants tell A&M they’re going to stop donating money or not

follow through on plans to give, though he has no idea how often they make good on such

threats.

State Rep. Fred Brown, R-College Station, defends A&M’s program but said he

would like it better if it were amended to give legacy points to students whose parents went to Prairie

View A&M, A&M-Kingsville and other schools in the A&M system. He said he will file a bill to effect

that change at the Legislature’s next regular session.

But if Burnam, Coleman and

others have their way, A&M might not have a legacy program by then. Passage of Burnam’s bill would

make Texas the first state to ban legacy preferences, though some black legislators say they’re more

interested in getting A&M to consider race than to discontinue legac
y preferences.

Until

any change is made, national experts advise A&M to be proactive.

“Universities with a

history of statistically small minority populations should tread carefu
lly if they’re going to

maintain legacy programs,” said Dan Oren, a Yale professor of psychiatry and the author of Joining the

Club: A History of Jews and Yale. “They better have other minority outreach programs to make up for

that.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s