Author: mopress

  • Gates: Expects Flood of Emails as Mays Fails to Return Calls

    Gates said he was prepared for a flood of e-mails on the subject and that

    he hopes most Aggies see this as the “next logical step” in a new approach to picking the A&M student

    body.

    “My guess is that a lot of former students don’t really appreciate how little

    impact legacy has had on the process in the real world,” he said. “If the reality is that legacy helped

    300 get in, the perception of some Aggies is probably that it’s 3,000.”

    He added that

    A&M officials will continue to encourage students from Aggie families to apply for

    admission.

    Gates said he discussed the legacy decision with the A&M System Board of

    Regents and members were supportive. Several regents — including Chairman Lowry Mays and Vice Chairman

    Erle Nye, both A&M graduates — could not be reached for comment Friday afternoon. [John LeBas

    theeagle.com January 10, 2004]

    See Official Gates statement of Jan. 9, 2004 below.

    January 9, 2004

    STATEMENT ON LEGACY

    http://www.tamu.edu/president/speeche

    s/040109legacy.html

    Texas A&M University President Robert Gates

    On

    December 3, 2003, when I announced the comprehensive plan to recruit and enroll more minorities at

    Texas A&M University, I stated that all students would be admitted based on individual merit and

    potential contribution to the University community. Further, I stated at that time and in subsequent

    meetings with legislators and internal and external groups that all admissions factors—including

    legacy—were under review to ensure that we have a fair and equitable process. This was due in part to

    our understanding that there was an inconsistency in the continued use of legacy in a merit-based

    process.

    We believe, as virtually every university in the country does, that students

    whose family members have attended its university add value to what makes those institutions unique.

    This is especially true at Texas A&M. At the same time, the solidity of the Aggie family and the

    strength of the Aggie culture are not the result of four out of 100 points on an admissions evaluation.

    For the three-fourths of our freshmen who were enrolled in the fall of 2003 under the top ten percent

    law and automatic academic admission, legacy was irrelevant. Indeed, not one student of the more than

    10,000 who were admitted was admitted solely on the basis of legacy. In fact, legacy has been a formal

    part of A&M’s admissions process only since 1989 and has played far less of a role in admissions than

    either Aggies or others probably believe.

    In an admissions process based on individual

    merit and potential contribution to the university community, prior affiliation with Texas A&M should

    not be a criterion. We intend to continue to urge students from Aggie families to apply to A&M and, if

    accepted, to enroll here. But, after consultation with each of the Texas A&M University System Regents,

    I have decided that, effective immediately, Texas A&M will no longer award points for legacy in the

    admissions review process.

    I had intended that legacy be addressed in an ongoing review

    of our admissions procedures. However, public perceptions of the fairness and equity of our process

    clearly are important and require prompt action to deal with an obvious inconsistency in an admissions

    strategy based on individual merit.

    Indeed, in retrospect, this decision regarding

    legacy should have been part of my December 3rd announcement and because it was not, Texas A&M has

    suffered unfortunate negative publicity. I take full responsibility for that.

    Today’s

    announcement brings greater consistency and equity to our admissions decision making process. We will

    continue our review.

  • Gatsby, Zizek, and a Victory for Florida Tomato Workers

    By Nick Braune
    Mid-Valley Town Crier
    by permission

    Over Christmas break I reread The Great Gatsby, my favorite novel. It describes our human fate, relentless and connecting up to human violence (called “carelessness” in the book); like an ancient Greek tragedy, the novel always leaves me drenched and almost cleansed at the end. Written in 1922, it is “the great American novel,” loaded with insights and criticism, even pointing out America’s beginning fixation on automobiles, “driving toward death in the cooling twilight.”

    And, if that was not moody enough, I got a new book for Christmas, Violence, by a philosopher from Slovenia, Slavoj Zizek (pronounced “JeeJek,” I’m told). His book opens this way:

    “There is an old story about a worker suspected of stealing: every evening, as he leaves the factory, the wheelbarrow he rolls in front of him is carefully inspected. The guards can find nothing. It is always empty.” The guards never figure it out, but…”The worker is stealing wheelbarrows!”

    It made me think: We are always looking for little instances of violence, signs of violence, worrying that violence might happen on this street and being shocked when we see it in school or on a border between nations. We worry about certain T.V. shows, but we never really look at the overall structure. Maybe the whole wheelbarrow is violent; our whole social administration, our religions are violent; and, of course, Hollywood — but not just Hollywood — California is violent. We are.

    Our entertainments, our fascinations, our corporate farms, our globalized capitalist economy itself–all are part of a violent network. Violence as injustice and cruelty is everywhere: Israel, Yes. Hamas, Yes. But also America, whose “geopolitical” plans for the Middle East have caused the current Gaza conflict, ultimately pushing confrontation and blocking U.N. peace efforts, and other efforts. (Remember America’s on-going geopolitical invasion and occupation of Iraq has taken over half a million lives, and created 3 million refugees, some displaced inside Iraq and some now living outside it.)

    “Oh, I am so shocked that Hamas fired random rockets onto territory that Israel now owns,” say some conservatives. “Oh, I am so shocked at Israel’s disproportionate response, killing 100 Palestinians for every one Israeli killed,” say some liberals. But I think Zizek might say, “Look at the disparities between rich and poor and the millions of people killed through 200 years of British and U.S. imperialism in Asia, the Middle East and Africa. For once, let’s quit acting shocked, notice the wheelbarrow, and examine root causes.”

    Although I may review Violence for this column soon — it deserves a good review — let me report something directly hopeful.

    * * *

    I interviewed Marina Saenz-Luna, a woman in her early twenties, I guess, whom I worked with two summers ago on issues involving detention centers. She has since moved up north to be an organizer with Just Harvest USA, but was visiting here in the Rio Grande Valley last week.

    Braune: I know your group has celebrated a victory lately for the tomato pickers in Florida.

    Saenz-Luna: Yes. Just Harvest USA is proudly linked to the Campaign for Fair Food created after the CIW victory against Taco Bell a few years ago. [CIW is a Florida farmworker union: Coalition of Immokalee Workers.] The most recent victory was an agreement with Subway. Subway met the workers’ demands: A one penny more per pound wage increase, the creation of a code of conduct that would extend to all of the workers that pick fruits and vegetables in the U.S. for Subway restaurants, and a zero tolerance policy on slavery.

    Braune: I know that the Subway settlement is a great victory: forcing Taco Bell, then McDonalds and Burger King and now Subway to start recognizing the tomato pickers’ dignity. But what is the general mission of Just Harvest USA?

    Saenz-Luna: We want to advance farmworker rights, by drawing attention and commitment to human and labor rights, especially through the sustainable food movement. We generate national awareness of farmworkers’ struggles for justice among people who care about local, healthy, non-corporate food and agriculture; and we mobilize this sector in effective campaigns for living wages and safe and dignified working conditions for farmworkers.

    Braune: I know you identify closely with the working class and the poor. And you see them as the agent of change, right?

    Saenz-Luna: Yes. I once worked a job where I too was exploited and at a loss. It’s been the CIW that has inspired me to speak up for myself: members tell their own stories and lead others in the Campaign for Fair Food. I moved down to Immokalee, Florida at the beginning of last year as an intern to learn how some of the lowest-paid and least respected workers in the U.S. were getting not only higher wages for the tomatoes they picked for about 90% of the country in the winter-time but more importantly gaining dignity and respect.

    Braune: And now you work in Baltimore with the national network.

    Saenz-Luna: Yes, I am now on the steering committee representing Baltimore, Maryland and the surrounding area (where I now live) for the Student/Farmworker Alliance. (Two people in the Valley in our network are Victoria Siempre and John-Michael Torres. The Valley has a special relationship with Immokalee: I met many families when I was in Immokalee, Florida who had started picking oranges and grapefruits in the Valley a few decades ago.)

    The Campaign for Fair Food is calling on the agribusiness industry as a whole to take responsibility for the miserable conditions that those who labor to harvest our fruit and vegetables endure. Our campaign has included tactics of brand-busting fast food logos, making alternative, independent media to tell farmworker’s stories, and ultimately influencing popular culture across culturas and ages by engaging in creative non-violent actions, marches and discussions big and small.

  • Minutemen in Denton

    On Saturday, "a well-publicized protest by about a dozen Minutemen,
    with three times that many gathered to oppose them" shut down a Denton
    day labor site, reports Bill Teeter of the Fort Worth Star Telegram.

    Organizer Cindy Lou of the LoneStar Minutemen applauded the
    results. And the newspaper described her organization as: "U.S.
    residents who voluntarily keep watch on the Mexican border to spot
    illegal immigrants and report them to authorities."

    Outnumbering the Minutemen 3-to-1 were a coalition of protesters from
    "the League of United Latin American Citizens, the Denton County
    Democratic Party, North Texas for Justice and Peace, Anti-Racist Action
    and Peace Action Denton."

    "They are here to oppose the immigration; we are here to support"
    the workers, said Coty Rodriguez, the District 3 LULAC director for
    North Texas. Legislative and foreign-policy initiatives can address
    immigration problems, she said.

    Arvin Hill of Peace Action Denton calls the Minutemen’s assertions "over the top."

    "They characterize immigration as an invasion coordinated by the
    Mexican government and elements of our own government," Hill said.

    Hill also said the Minutemen have been found to have ties to white supremacists.

    Minuteman Marvin Brooke vehemently challenged that.

    "When you can’t come up with a valid, legal argument, then you shout ‘racist,’" said Brooke, of Allen.

    Quotes from "Group protests at day-labor site" Jan. 8, 2005.

  • Border Wars, Corruption Top Drug Stories for 2005

    Gunfights in Nuevo Laredo and police corruption top Scott Henson’s top
    ten list of Texas Drug War stories for 2005. The shooting wars at
    the border are about control of Interstate Highway 35, says
    Henson. Meanwhile a border sheriff stands convicted of favoring
    some drug operators while busting others. At this point we’d like
    to yawn and make reference to the Ginsberg thesis, that the drug war
    has always been a prohibition style war over who gets favored and who

    gets busted. It was the Reagan White House after all that was
    nearly outed for running a wholesale cocaine op under direction of Col.
    Norte.

    In Dallas, who got busted didn’t even depend on drugs at all, but a
    scam involving throwdown chalk! So the Governor has reined in
    renegade drug task forces has he? The Texas Civil Rights Review
    contributed a story to the effort, but we can’t help remembering that
    this means ultimate busting authority along Texas highways will soon be
    safely restored to the Department of Public Safety. Are we
    yawning again? Sorry. It’s quite early in the year still,
    and we’re having trouble waking up to the news.
    Henson’s top ten list at Grits for Breakfast

  • Barrientos: Erodes an Image

    “To

    continue the Legacy Program at A&M while removing race as a consideration for admission, in my mind,

    further erodes the image of this fine institution at a time that it needs to do more to attract

    minority students,” said Senator Gonzalo Barrientos. [Sen. Ellis Press Release

    1/7/2004].