State funding for Texas A&M University, and possibly confirmation of its regents,
might be on the line unless the university enrolls more minority students beginning next fall, a state
senator said Monday.
Sen. Royce West, D-Dallas, made the comment after African American
and Hispanic lawmakers met with A&M President Robert Gates.
Source:
mysanantonio.com
http://news.mysanantonio.com
/story.cfm?
xla=saen&xlb=320&xlc=1096308&xld=320
“Welcome. This portal responds to the immediate Civil Rights challenge posed by Texas
A&M’s decision to suspend affirmative action in admissions.”
For complete text of Dec.
2003 page header, see “Read More” below: Dec. 2003
“Interposition and
Nullification” at A&M
Welcome. This portal responds to the immediate Civil Rights
challenge posed by Texas A&M’s decision to suspend affirmative action in
admissions.
Please feel free to add your comments to the stories below. No registration
required for that. Registration to post other forms of content, including “Forum” messages, is free,
quick, and secure.
Come back to browse updates, or register your email address for
occasional bulletins.
Note: The Texas Civil Rights Review began collecting links and
resources about institutionalized racism during a 1997 federal review of civil rights in state higher
education programs.
The team determined that vestiges of segregation still existed. This
places Texas in a special category of civil rights responsibility.
See essential
materials on the history of civil rights in Texas higher education at “Sections” (from the menu to
your upper left).
Thanks for your interest.
Greg Moses
Site
Editor
gmosesx@prodigy.net
A Poor Legacy:
A&M admissions policy
smacks of
unfairness
EDITORIAL-Dallas Morning News
12:04 AM CST on Wednesday, January 7, 2004
Texas A&M last year admitted 312 white freshmen from families of A&M graduates –
freshmen who wouldn’t have gotten in otherwise. It’s a nod to a long-standing program that gives
additional consideration to the children, grandchildren or siblings of former A&M students.
But
this is the same public university that announced last month it wouldn’t consider the race of
applicants in its admission process, even though many schools, public and private, take race into
account among other academic and non-academic factors.
As state Rep. Garnet Coleman of
Houston put it, “If you want to go to A&M, it pays to be a legacy applicant rather than
black.”
While that isn’t the message A&M officials intend, it certainly is the message
they have delivered.
In abolishing race as an admissions consideration, A&M vowed to
increase minority outreach and to focus on attracting low-income and first-generation college students.
But to our mind, it is wildly inconsistent for the university to reject race as an admissions factor
and then to consider family DNA to be perfectly acceptable.
A&M officials say minority
applicants with ties to the A&M family are admitted at about the same rate as white applicants with
family ties to the school. But while that seems fair on paper, there is a disparate impact. Last year,
six blacks and 27 Hispanics – students who wouldn’t have been admitted if family members hadn’t
preceded them at A&M – got in under the legacy program. In contrast, family ties provided enough points
on the school’s admissions scale for nine times as many white candidates to be admitted who otherwise
wouldn’t have been accepted.
Universities that regard an applicant’s race as one of
many factors for admission would be justified to include family ties as well in their basket of
considerations. But now that A&M has removed race from its selection process, the school also should
jettison its legacy program, as other Texas public universities have done. If, as A&M officials
contend, most applicants don’t need legacy consideration to be admitted, then that’s yet another
reason to ditch the program.
Perception matters, and the legacy program at A&M leaves
the impression that the university isn’t serious about increasing its minority enrollment. It’s time
for the antiquated system to become history.
The A&M chapter of the Young Conservatives of Texas’ recent affirmative action bake
sale has created a mass of heated correspondence between the organization and school officials about
diversity.
Source:
thebatt.com
http://www.thebatt.com
/news/575093.html
Jan. 8, 2004
End `legacy’ program, A&M urged
Minorities say policy
favors white applicants
By Todd Ackerman
Copyright 2004 Houston
Chronicle
Minority politicians and activists around the state Wednesday urged Texas A&M
University to bring consistency to an admissions policy that doesn’t consider race or ethnicity but
includes a “legacy” program that favors whites. The legacy program, which gives points to
applicants whose parents, siblings or grandparents went to A&M, is the deciding factor in the admission
of more than 300 white freshmen annually. Only a handful of blacks and about 25 Hispanics are admitted
each year because of the program.
“This legacy program thing is nothing more than
conservative affirmative action,” said state Rep. Paul Moreno, D-El Paso. “It’s admission by
invitation only.”
Jim Harrington, a veteran civil rights lawyer who heads the Texas
Civil Rights Project, said A&M needs to change its policy or “it’s going to be Brown vs. the board of
regents of Texas A&M,” an allusion to the landmark desegregation case of the
1950s.
Moreno, Harrington and Bledsoe were among a number of officials who attacked
A&M’s admissions policy at a news conference at the state Capitol. News conferences were also
conducted on the front steps of City Hall in Houston and in San Antonio.
A&M’s legacy
program is drawing particular fire because the university recently announced it will not consider race
in admissions. The announcement followed a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that universities can give
minorities a boost in admissions, in effect overturning the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals’ Hopwood
decision, which had banned racial preferences in higher education in Texas since
1996.
Spurning the new opportunity, A&M President Robert Gates said attracting
minorities is a top priority but stressed that “students should be admitted on merit — and no other
basis.”
He had no response to the criticism of the legacy program Wednesday, releasing
a statement that said A&M’s admissions process has been “under review and will continue to be
evaluated to ensure it achieves one of the university’s primary objectives — that of having a student
body that is more representative of the state of Texas.”
A&M’s undergraduate
population is 82 percent white, 9 percent Hispanic, 2 percent black and 3 percent Asian-
American.
Typically, anywhere from 1,650 to more than 2,000 A&M applicants a year
receive legacy credit, four points on a 100-point scale that also takes into account such factors as
class rank and test scores.
While most applicants don’t need legacy points to get in,
in 2003, 312 whites were admitted because of them. In 2002, that figure was 321.
The
program was the difference for six blacks and 27 Hispanics in 2003, and three blacks and 25 Hispanics
in 2002.
State Rep. Lon Burnam, D-Fort Worth, who has twice filed bills in the
Legislature to end A&M’s legacy program, said last week he plans to sponsor such legislation again, as
early as spring if a special session is called.
But state Rep. Garnet Coleman, D-
Houston, who said at the Houston news conference that he will support any such bill, added that he’d
prefer A&M acquiesce on its own and change its policy, either to end legacies or consider race. He said
he plans to ask Gov. Rick Perry to have his appointees on the A&M board of regents vote to make the
school’s admissions policy “consistent.”
Sens. Rodney Ellis, D-Houston, and Gonzalo
Barrientos, D-Austin, added that they plan to take a closer look before voting to confirm future
gubernatorial appointees to university governing boards.
Other officials at the three
news conferences included U.S. Congress members Chris Bell and Sheila Jackson Lee; state
representatives Mike Villarreal, Joaquin Castro, Jose Menendez, Dawnna Dukes, Jessica Farrar and Dora
Olivo; and representatives from the Urban League, the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational
Fund, and the League of United Latin American Citizens.
A&M’s legacy program was even
criticized by an official of an anti-affirmative action group that Tuesday praised A&M’s decision not
to consider race while announcing that a loose coalition of conservative leaders recently wrote to
Perry, other elected state officials and the University of Texas System board of regents, calling on
them to stop UT from reintroducing racial preferences in admissions.
The official,
Center for Equal Opportunity senior fellow Edward Blum, said he thinks legacy admissions are “a stupid
idea.” He said A&M should revisit them.
The letter about UT was signed by former U.S.
Attorney General Edwin Meese, California anti-affirmative action leader Ward Connerly, and eight other
political or legal activists.
“We are all, frankly, baffled why (UT President Larry)
Faulkner would insist on treating students differently because of their skin color and their
ancestors’ national origin when there is demonstrably no reason to engage in such unfair and divisive
activity,” said the letter, sent in mid-December.
Wednesday, there seemed to be no
confusion among officials at the news conferences.
Villarreal, D-San Antonio, noted the
inconsistency of A&M passing up an opportunity to increase minority enrollment because that would
“amount to special treatment of a specific set of the student population, then in the next breath
continuing a program that does exactly that for a segment of the student population already
disproportionately represented.”
“A public university can’t have it both ways and
maintain any semblance of fairness, consistency and equity,” he said.
Clay Robison
contributed to this story from Austin.
Texas Civil Rights Review 