Category: Uncategorized

  • Diane Wilson: Last Year about this Time Where Do you Think they Threw Her?

    Why into jail, of course, with Medea Bejamin and other "raucous" perhaps "unreasonable" inaugural protesters, reports the New Standard via a source from CodePink.

    This year, Wilson’s publishing house Chelsea Green proudly posts word of its author’s jailing Dec. 5, 2005 at a Houston fundraiser featuring Dick Cheney.

    As Kristin Mack reported for the Houston Chronicle:

    At least one protester infiltrated the event. Diane Wilson of the progressive women’s group Code Pink said she paid only $50."

    "I guess they needed people inside," she said. "You can get in pretty cheap. I didn’t want to give too much."

    She briefly disrupted Cheney’s speech and rolled out a banner that reads: "Corrupt greed kills from Bhopal to Baghdad."

    Wilson was promptly escorted out.

    Meanwhile, 21 organizations, among them Veterans for Peace, the International Socialist Organization and Progressive Action Alliance, protested outside.

    Note: See also this web bonus from bhopal.net: Diane Wilson ‘Manhunt’ for Anderson Ends With Diane in Jail

  • Dallas Fed: NAFTA Increased Texas Exports

    Overall, NAFTA had an export-weighted average effect of 28 percent on Texas exports to Mexico. Adjusted for inflation, the trade deal accounted for roughly a quarter of Texas’ 111 percent increase in exports to Mexico between 1993 and 2000.

    During the same period, Texas’ NAFTA-related exports to Canada rose 47 percent, or about a third of the state’s 131 percent gain in that market. Texas sells quite a bit more to Mexico than to Canada. Even if the percentage effect is smaller, the NAFTA-led increases in exports to Mexico are larger in dollar terms. Industries with statistically significant gains in exports to Mexico as a result of NAFTA were rubber and miscellaneous plastic products (79 percent), printing and publishing (78 percent), textile mill products (75 percent), petroleum and coal products (69 percent), leather and leather products (71 percent) and electronic equipment (49 percent). Significant declines were found in lumber and wood products (89 percent) and furniture and fixtures (75 percent).

    The statistically significant NAFTA winners in terms of exports to Canada were oil and gas exploration equipment (286 percent), furniture and fixtures (75 percent), industrial machinery including computers (70 percent), apparel (66 percent), instruments and related products (58 percent) and rubber and miscellaneous plastic products (54 percent). The only significant decline was in metal mining (88 percent).

    The diversity in gains and losses of exports among industries suggests trade deals affect economic sectors differently. Lower tariffs no doubt gave some Texas industries an advantage over Mexican and Canadian companies. Export declines might signal an inability to compete, although they could simply reflect some firms’ decisions to shift economic activity to other states. Because Texas had more winners than losers, though, we can conclude that NAFTA in general made Texas industries more competitive.

    Southwest Economy

    Issue 2, March/April 2006
    Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas

    Did NAFTA Spur Texas Exports?
    By Anil Kumar

    http://www.dallasfed.org/research/swe/2006/swe0602b.html

  • Celebrity Justice: Jones v Hutchison

    Veteran actor TOMMY LEE JONES has criticised Texan Senator KAY BAILEY
    HUTCHINSON’s ideas on how to control immigration on the US/Mexico
    border.

    The FUGITIVE star, who lives in San Antonio near the
    Texas/Mexico border (sic) with his Hispanic wife DAWN, is angered by
    Hutchinson’s plans for vigilante groups to guard borders.

    He says, "We have a United States senator who has been quoted
    as saying that our borders are haemorrhaging, a bleeding wound… and
    wants to introduce a bill that pours millions (of dollars) into federal
    enforcement of the borders and by golly she wants to give money to the
    vigilante groups.

    "Just like a lot of politicians, (she) feeds on headlines.

    "In this case she’s making her appeal to rabid paranoia which is dangerous.

    "It’s a very complicated issue. There are people working in
    agriculture whose families have been split by the existence of this
    border and they’re willing and able to do jobs in the north that no one
    else will do.

    "They don’t deserve to have their culture and their families split in two." 11/11/2005. found at a few websites, not well sourced

  • Another No for November: No Jail Expansion in Austin

    This just in from Scott Henson: vote no for jail expansion: " Travis
    officials don’t deserve new jail bond authority because they haven’t
    taken available steps to reduce overincarceration pressures short of
    new building. In particular, more than 60 percent of Travis jail
    inmates are incarcerated awaiting trial. Other counties have addressed
    this problem by boosting their use of personal bonds. That’s also what
    Travis County should do — it’d be a lot cheaper than building more
    jail space."

    See the full argument at Grits for Breakfast.
    Among those not incarcerated waiting trial is Tom Delay. Yet consider
    the scale of hurt caused by his policies. If personal bond is good enough for
    him…–gm

  • LULAC Action Alert on Federal Education Cuts

    ACTION ALERT

    Stop Raiding My Child’s Education !!

    LULAC
    Urges its Members to Call and Write Their Senators Now and Let Their Voices Be Heard !

    Washington, DC-The League of United Latin American Citizens is outraged
    by the House’s latest efforts to cut education funding from critical
    programs.
    All LULAC members and public officials are strongly urged to
    call, write, and email their state senators now demanding to eliminate
    these budget cuts before they become law. It is critical that the
    members on the U.S. Senate hear from their constituents today to let
    them know that they wholeheartedly reject these education budget cuts.

    In all, the House adopted a package of three bills that
    imposes the largest cut in student aid in history, cutting $12 billion
    over the next five years and making it more difficult and expensive for
    students to borrow money to attend college.

    The defense spending bill and the budget reconciliation bill
    were passed in the early morning of December 19th . The defense
    spending bill passed decisively by over 200 votes, while the last two
    bills were adopted marginally by six votes and two votes respectively.
    The third bill, or the Labor-HHS bill, was approved last week.

    Talking Points:

    * Cuts in funding for ESEA and NCLB of $1 billion, in addition
    to bringing the funding down BELOW the level that was provided three
    years earlier.

    * Disadvantaged public schools will be the hardest hit.
    Under-funding will continue by over $27 billion and this proposal will
    make further cuts on schools that cannot afford them.

    * Threatens to put a college education out of reach for students by making it harder for students to receive aid.

    * Cuts in the federal share of special education funding (from
    18.6 percent to 17.8 percent), falling well short of the 30-year-old
    commitment to fund 40 percent of special education funding.

    * For the first time ever federal taxpayer-funded vouchers
    will be established disguised as "hurricane relief": The American
    people have consistently rejected national vouchers programs. They have
    proven to be unaffordable, unproven, and unnecessary.

    * Expansion of current loan forgiveness laws to include
    private school teachers. Since taxpayer money will be used to fund
    private schools with teacher recruitment, public schools around the
    country will continue to be under-funded and experience teacher
    shortages . Religious schools will be able to accept taxpayer dollars
    with little to no accountability in comparison to public schools.

    At a time when our children need a greater commitment and
    greater investment from our national leaders, we cannot abandon them by
    cutting funding in their education.

    College tuition is rising every year, making it less
    affordable for working class families to financially support their
    children’s decision to go to college. If we allow Congress to make cuts
    on federal grants, it will prevent poor students from receiving Pell
    Grants, thereby making them less and less likely to be able to attend a
    college of their choice.

    Our children should not be penalized for living in poor
    conditions, but rather they should be given the most aid to relieve
    their families affected by poverty and Hurricane Katrina. Only through
    education can we lift our communities up.

    LULAC urges you to contact your Senator now! To get your
    Senator’s contact information call the Capitol switchboard at (202)
    225-3121 or go to http://www.congress.org or to http://www.lulac.org and email your
    Senator.

    Tell them:

    * Say no to the Education Budget Cuts and to vouchers. Public education is critical to the success of our community.

    * Our children need access, better resources, and more funding for their schools. Not cuts to their education.

    * Higher education should be made affordable not impossible.

    The League of the United Latin American Citizen (www.lulac.org)
    advances the economic conditions, educational attainment, political
    influence, health and civil rights of Hispanic Americans through
    community-based programs operating at more than 700 LULAC councils
    nationwide.

    Note: Thanks to Angela Valenzuela for forwarding this item.–gm