Category: Uncategorized

  • On the Slogan: 'the only good fascist is a dead one'

    it’s not the dagger through the swastika that bothers me. fascism as a social practice should be killed.

    but to say that "the only good fascist is a dead one" evokes for me
    re-inscription of the form of masculinity that empowers fascism in the
    first place (what Stan Goff calls the gendered degeneration of American
    politics).

    it also sounds like an echo of the public morality of a death penalty
    state where imagining the deaths of real people is not the moral
    equivalent of war, but war itself.

    Woody Guthrie’s guitar said "this machine kills fascists", but it was not a dagger that he carried, was it? besides, if there are fascists, as there are racists, the problem is
    poorly understood as individual existence of any sort. fascism and
    racism are ways of ordering social reality. and like I say, I have no
    problem killing those orders. but how do you touch the problem of
    killing an order of things via the symbolic execution of individuals?

    it is precisely by mistaking racism and fascism as something confined
    to Klan membership that encourages everyone to ignore widespread
    ignorance and apathy. notice for example how Klan arguments against gay
    marriage are no different than arguments propounded from pulpits and
    podiums everywhere else in Texas. they are fascist and racist arguments
    no doubt.

    the slogan that "the only good fascist is a dead one", because
    it re-inscribes fascist masculinity, death penalty mentality, and
    ideological misdirection as to the problem that fascism poses, takes
    the bait that Klan logic offers. it is therefore an expression of pure
    reaction.

    please re-consider–gm

  • Facilities Funding Disparities Survive Judicial Review

    The Edgewood defendants, led by MALDEF attorneys, had emphasized
    inequities in facilities funding as a glaring example of
    ‘constitutional inefficiency’ in the structure of Texas
    education. But the court refused to isolate the problem of
    facilities from overall funding equity, and then argued that raw
    disparities in existing facilities could not meet the burden of proof.

    Despite poor facilities, Edgwood and Alvarado plaintiffs (with only one
    exception) were maintaining their accreditation, said the court, so the
    educational impact of poor buildings was not so obvious. Without
    a stronger connection being argued between poor facilities and poor
    education, the court said it had not enough evidence to rule
    inequitable facilities unconstitutional. Twenty five percent of
    the state’s districts were not even charging facilities taxes.

    The State defendants also argue that to prove constitutional
    inefficiency the intervenors must offer evidence of an inability to
    provide for a general diffusion of knowledge without additional
    facilities, and that they have failed to do so. Again, we agree.
    Efficiency requires only substantially equal access to revenue for
    facilities necessary for an adequate system.

    The slideshows of cracked walls and ceilings that were so
    compelling to view in court did not carry much weight within the legal
    framework constructed by the Texas Supreme Court.–gm

  • New Evidence of African Genesis: The White Skin Mutation

    Although precise dating is impossible, several scientists
    speculated on the basis of its spread and variation that the
    mutation arose between 20,000 and 50,000 years ago. That
    would be consistent with research showing that a wave of
    ancestral humans migrated northward and eastward out of
    Africa about 50,000 years ago.

    –Rick Weiss, Washington Post (Dec. 15, 2005)

  • PODER Denounces Halloween Hearing on Rocha Killing

    PRESS RELEASE:

    People Organized in Defense of Earth and her Resources

    October 26, 2005

    Mr. Ashton Cumberbatch, Jr.,
    Police Monitor – City of Austin
    301 W. Second Street
    Austin, TX 78701

    RE: Reschedule Daniel Rocha Public Hearing

    Dear Mr. Cumberbatch:

    PODER staff, board members and volunteers are asking that you
    reschedule the Citizen Review Panel hearing on the fatal shooting of
    18-year-old Daniel Rocha from Halloween night to another night.

    We are upset, mad and disappointed that you would try to get the
    general public out on a night that most families are involved in
    communities activities for children. We are also upset that you want us
    to fight the Halloween traffic that occurs in the downtown area each
    year around Halloween. This shooting happened in East Austin and you
    could have had the public hearing in numerous places in East Austin and
    not on Halloween night!

    The Texas Coalition Advocating Justice for Juveniles (TCAJJ)
    rescheduled their Round Table discussion at Austin Community Campus on
    Webberville Road because we were told that the Public Hearing for
    Daniel Rocha was going to be taking place on Wednesday, October 26,
    2005.

    Do you want public input? You know that having a Public Hearing on
    Halloween night is an insult to the community? Well it is!! We demand
    that you change the date.

    Respectfully,

    Susana Almanza
    PODER

    Erika Gonzalez
    PODER

    Janie Rangel
    TANK Assoc.

    Tommy & Bertha Williams
    Stuart Circle Assoc.

    Marie Govea

    Calmar Cove Assoc.

    Danel Llanes
    Red Bluff Assoc

    Corazon Renteria
    Larch Terrace Assoc.

    Xc: Mayor Wynn & City Council Members,
    Toby Futrell-City Manager,
    Rep. Eddie Rodriguez,
    Senator Barrientos,
    NAACP-Nelson Linder,
    LULAC,
    ACLU,
    Action Group

    PODER
    P.O. Box 6237

    Austin, Texas 78762-6237
    Email: poder@austin.rr. com

    website: http://www.poder-texas.org

  • On Suitability: 'Not impossible therefore not unconstutional'

    From the Supreme Court ruling (p. 103):

    Neither the structure nor the operation of the funding system
    prevents it from efficiently accomplishing a general diffusion of
    knowledge. The State may discharge its duty to make suitable provision
    for free public schools through school districts by relying on local
    tax revenues, even as heavily as it now does. Such reliance, especially
    given the multitude and diversity of school districts, inevitably makes
    it difficult to achieve efficiency because of the vast disparities in
    local property wealth, but efficiency is not impossible. We have
    suggested that these difficulties might be avoided by fundamental
    changes in the structure of the system, but the possibility of
    improvement does not render the present system unsuitable for
    adequately and efficiently providing a public education. Accordingly,
    we conclude that the system does not violate the constitutional
    requirement of suitability.