Category: Uncategorized

  • MEChA Facts and Myths: Further Thoughts on Mr. Jones

    By Greg Moses

    As we await Alex Jones’ promised sequels to his report from the Diez y
    Seis rally, a review of links at Azteca net suggests that preliminary
    reports from Mr. Jones appear to be based on a 2003 smear campaign
    against California’s Lt. Gov. Cruz Bustamante, whose college membership
    in MEChA was turned against him during his campaign for Governor of
    California. As argued
    by Jorge Mariscal, the scare tactics used by familiar pundits against
    MEChA have a legacy in Anti-Mexican hate groups. See also: Mecha
    Facts and Myths by Ralph de Unamuno at azteca.net

    Alex Jones is a Minuteman sympathizer who
    sees the US-Mexico border in terms of a war zone. On the Alex
    Jones radio show today (Sept. 22) he encouraged his audience to help
    him get some Minutemen guests on his show, explaining that his direct
    calls to the organization have not been very successful. He pleaded
    with his audience to remind the Minutemen that Alex, "is having rallies
    to defend you!" Apparently, some of the Minutemen treat Mr. Jones
    as a lightweight. Meanwhile, standing among
    the protesters who demonstrated with or merely alongside Mr. Jones
    Saturday were people with signs demanding "Mexico Out of USA" and "One
    Nation One Language". Whenever people who keep such company shout
    loudly about "Mexican Supremacism" we have a right to wonder what
    bothers them most: supremacism or Mexican?
    In keeping with our general method of approach, to not
    multiply disputes, I enjoyed hearing Mr. Jones today jealously guard
    the liberties of USA citizens against powerful government
    encroachments. What puzzles me is why Mr. Jones would support
    efforts by citizens to extend the power of the state over the freedoms
    of migrants. It seems the puzzle is solved so long as one draws a
    very bright line around who does and who does not count as a person
    with rights. And so long as Mr. Jones seeks to cultivate favor
    with fellow demonstrators and organizations who prefer to draw bright
    lines between Mexicans and the USA, we have a difficult time
    understanding why he gets so miffed at the very idea that others might
    appropriate his bright line schema, only to reverse the hierarchy of power.

    A framework of human and civil rights is the better alternative, and
    that’s why we won’t support one supremacist who stands in the favored
    circle condemning the alleged existence of would-be supremacists who
    would only reverse the
    power dynamic between groups already separated by Mr. Jones’ bright
    line. In this sort of sordid atmosphere, we wonder, why
    Mr.
    Jones, did you stand with or merely beside an obviously supremacist
    outpouring on a day of Mexican-American celebration? You say it was to
    expose extremist hate groups within the Mexican-American community. But
    given the company you stood with–and the supremacist exclusions they
    represent in their plain sign language–what gives you the right to
    complain about supremacism of any sort?

    —–

    Note: "In parts two and three, I will detail the long trail of horrors that I
    witnessed as well as posting a lengthy video report documenting our
    claims. We have ten hours of footage from four cameras, which includes
    people frothing and screaming racist comments and then calling us
    racists for saying that we should all live together in peace."–Alex
    Jones

  • Affidavit of Don Doyle

    Note: the Doyle affidavit begins with the drug surveilance
    activities, the suspect’s [X’s] house, and an attempt on the part of
    police to determine a supplier for the "middleman" [X]. In
    Doyle’s affadvit a suburban [Doyle says a white one, Shroeder says a
    brown one] is identified and Doyle follows it to the stop sign where
    Schroeder initates the take down.

    I had the mic in my hand and was preparing to advise over the radio
    that the vehicle was turning right onto Pleasant Valley and that I did
    not have a traffic violation yet. Before I could get out on the
    radio I saw Officer Shroeder and officer Borton turning from south
    bound Pleasant Valley to west bound Quick Silver. They pulled
    sort of diagonally and to the front of the White SUV, but did not block
    the vehicle. I believe officer Schroeder was driving and I
    noticed that the Red and Blue emergency lights were activated. I
    knew we were on our channel and that I need to switch to Frank radio to
    advise we were making a traffic stop. I was also trying to get my
    emergency lights activated. As I was doing this I observed a
    Hispanic male exit the passenger side of the SUV and jump a
    fence. I saw Officer Borton coming to the driver side of the SUV
    I heard her say "Sarge help Julie she has Rocha." I don’t recall
    seeing whether Officer Borton had her weapon or not. I
    immediately exited my vehicle and ran to the passenger side of the
    SUV. I was wearing my police raid vest and noticed that Officer
    Schroeder was wearing her police raid vest also. I did not see
    Officer Schroeder with her weapon drawn and I didn’t see the suspect
    with a weapon. I saw a Hispanic male trying to run away from
    Officer Schroeder and Officer Schroeder was trying to grab him to
    prevent him from escaping. The Hispanic male was bent over and
    pulling away from Officer Schroeder. I believe Officer Schroeder
    was behind or beside the Hispanic male. I approached and I was
    trying to grab the guy. I recall Officer Schroeder yelling
    police. I was focused on getting the guy to the ground. It
    was happening quick. Very quick. The guy was a little
    shorter than me and weighed less than me. His size did not
    concern me. I grabbed the guy’s shirt and he was struggling and
    and trying to pull away. The guy never punched or kicked me and I
    never saw him punch or kick Officer Schroeder. He was
    aggressively trying to pull away from us. It was like we were
    going in a circle with the guy. At some point I believe I had the
    guys wrist, but I really don’t recall seeing his hands during the
    struggle. Somehow during the struggle I ended up on the
    ground. I believe I was on the ground and was on my butt.
    During the struggle I lost site of Officer Schroeder and I was focused
    on the guy. I knew she was there, but like I said I was focused
    on him and was trying to grab a hold of him. I remember when I
    was on the ground I was able to grab one of his legs around the ankle
    area and I [in original] he was still on his feet and struggling.
    I was hoping we could get him to the ground. At that time I heard
    a pop….

    The affadavit goes on to describe Rocha falling on his back in his
    white t-shirt.  Only when Doyle rolls him over does he see the
    blood.

    Signed and notarized June 10, 2005

  • Medical Examiner Report: Daniel Rocha

    The entry wound is to the left back, below and medial to the scapula,
    centered 14 3/4 inches below the top of the head, 4 3/4 inches to the
    left of posterior midline, 6 1/2 inches below the upper surface of the
    shoulder, and about 1/4 inch above nipple level….The wound is also
    surrounded by a slightly eccentric deposit of black soot and powder
    tattoo marks which fan upward and to the left of the defect for 1.1 cm,
    and downward and medially for 8 mm….Eight loose flakes of gunpowder
    are present surrounding the wound in an 11.5 cm diameter.

    The bullet is easily palpated along the right lateral torso, 20 1/4
    inches below the top of the head…4 inches below nipple level….

    Subsequent autopsy reveals the bullet entered the left posterior chest
    cavity by fracturing the posterior 7th rib which is fragmented and
    splintered. Bone fragments are carried along the track of the
    bullet through the left lower lung lobe, along a 1.5 cm wide
    hemorrhagic track through the lung. The bulle then passed across
    the left lateral vertebral column at the level of the 8th intercostal
    space without producing any fracture, and perforated the aorta.
    The track through the aorta contains bone splinters, and an 11X1X5 mm
    detached copper petal of the bullet jacket. The bullet then
    passed through the right lower lung lobe, the right hemi-diaphram, and
    through the liver where a 4.5 cm wide stellate track is present from
    the dome of the liver to the anterior right lobe. The bullet then
    perforated the anterior reflection of the diaphram and fractured the
    anterolateral right 7th rib, lodging in the 7th intercostal space.

    The recovered bullet is semi-jacketed, with a 9mm wide base, and one
    petal of the jacket missing. The other petals of the copper
    jacket are curled backward, exposing the lead core. The number
    "1082" is inscribed in the open lead core of the bullet, and the bullet
    is placed in a small envelope, labeled, and released to… The
    detached copper petal recovered in the aorta is also released to…

    The gunshot wound produced a 1,000 cc left hemothrax, and a 650 cc
    right hemothrax. The path of the gunshot wound was back to front,
    left to right, and downward.

    A few other acute injuries are noted to the body:

    • Present along the lateral left upper arm, centered about 3 inches
      below the upper surface of the shoulder, is a 5X4 cm wide injury
      composed of stippled lines of punctate pink abrasions which lie about 5
      mm apart, and run upward from anterior to posterior.
    • Along the lateral right forehead is a 6 mm sparse red abrasion.
    • Along the anterior right chin, 1 1/4 inches below the corner of
      the mouth, 3/4 to the right of anterior midline, is a 1.2 X 0.7 cm
      abrasion.
    • Along the right anterior chest, beginning two inches below nipple
      level and 1 1/2 inches to the right of the anterior midline, and
      running downward to the right, is a 5 X 0.1 cm red scratch abrasion.
    • Along the mid back of the right upper arm is a faint 3 cm wide blue contusion.
    • Along the mid medial right forearm is a 3 X 2 mm red abrasion
  • Real Life Hero of Hotel Rwanda Coming in Oct. 2005

    The Texas Civil Rights Project just announced
    that this year’s banquet speaker will be the real life hero of Hotel
    Rwanda, Paul Rusesabagina, who transformed his hotel into life-saving
    shelter during an infamous season of genocide.

  • Another Man of Color Killed; Taser Moratorium Demanded

    By Greg Moses

    IndyMedia Austin

    As details of the Austin case are still being
    puzzled together by press and police officials, local activists said at
    a press conference Tuesday afternoon that tasers are dangerous enough
    to be taken out of service pending further review.

    [Wednesday’s
    Statesman reports that 33-year-old Michael Clark was shocked multiple
    times after being pepper sprayed during a struggle involving nine
    police officers. Family members told the Statesman that Clark was using
    crutches after a leg injury Sunday]

    Austin Dullnig of the
    Texas Civil Liberties Union questioned police use of lethal force in
    two recent incidents: the fatal shooting of "130 pound 18-year-old"
    Daniel Rocha who was allegedly resisting arrest in June during a
    traffic stop/drug bust; and now the death of a 30-something African
    American male who allegedly struggled with nine police officers who
    were called to the scene of a fight between the man and a woman. Police
    have been slow to post an official version of Monday’s Taser associated
    death. As of midnight Tuesday, no press releases mentioning the
    incident appear at the department’s official web site.

    Although
    Austin Police Chief Stan Knee has been widely quoted saying that
    Monday’s death was, "the first time someone has died in custody after
    being Tased," activists point to the case of Abel Ortega Perez who "was
    tased several times and later died". The Austin Chronicle reports that
    the official cause of death for Mr. Perez was "accidental overdose".
    The American-Statesman reports that police say Perez also had a
    superficial head wound prior to the burglary he was arrested for
    committing. Could the head wound prove to be the official cause of
    death? Statesman reporter Joshunda Sanders writes that the final
    autopsy (for the June 2004 case?) was still unavailable Monday night.
    Sanders attended Tuesday’s press conference outside police headquarters
    (see press release below).

    The Perez case went unreported in
    the press for more than a year, until local activists noticed a taser
    associated death in a routine statistical report. The Chronicle
    mentioned the case in August when reporting on an admission by Taser
    International, Inc. that "repeated, prolonged and/or continuous
    exposure to the Taser may cause strong muscle contractions that may
    impair breathing and respiration, particularly when the [weapon’s
    metal] probes are placed across the chest or diaphragm."

    ‘When
    Taser International admits their product is lethal, then you know you
    have a problem," said Debbie Russell at Tuesday’s press conference.

    Try
    "dies taser" on your favorite search engine. Try "dies taser" on your
    favorite search engine under news. In California, South Carolina,
    Nashville, and now in Austin, four people died this past week following
    taser attacks. In late August, men died in Ohio and Florida following
    taser attacks. In the Florida and South Carolina cases, reports say the
    victim was stunned twice. In Nashville it was "multiple times" by as
    many as 11 officers.

    Said Victoria of the Austin Spokescouncil,
    "The public perception of Tasers is that they save lives. But they are
    not only immoral, they are potentially deadly."

    Tasers were
    originally billed as weapons to be used instead of guns, but the weapon
    has taken on a life of its own. Taser use went up from 66 to 334 from
    2003 to 2004 says the Statesman. TCLU’s Dullnig said at the press
    conference that of 334 Taser uses reported by the Austin Police
    Department in 2004, only five were said to have replaced use of guns.
    Police are claiming that injuries to suspects and police have gone down
    as a result of taser deployment, but it’s not clear from web sources
    whether being stunned is being itself counted as an injury under usual
    circumstances.

    Spencer Crowl of ownside.org
    said, "Considering that the Taser is the second line of defense, I
    would be shocked if APD came out and said they would have needed to use
    guns 300-350 times."

    Amnesty International also worries,
    "that US police agencies are deploying tasers as a routine force option
    to subdue non-compliant or disturbed individuals who do not pose a
    serious danger to themselves or others." But Amnesty also worries that
    sometimes, "the use of electro-shock weapons appears to have violated
    international standards prohibiting torture or other cruel, inhuman or
    degrading treatment as well as standards set out under the United
    Nations (UN) Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement Officials and the
    Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement
    Officials."

    As Chief Knee told the Statesman, "use of the Taser
    during the arrest was in line with department policy, which allows use
    of a Taser whenever a suspect actively resists arrest."

    —–
    For immediate release – Sept. 27, 2005
    Contact: Debbie Russell: (512) 573-6194 "The Taser Hotline"

    MORATORIUM on TASERS NOW!!!!
    Austin Police Department must stop targeting the people of southeast Austin!

    PRESS CONFERENCE: 5pm today: APD Headquarters, 8th and I-35

    Yesterday,
    a person of color died approximately an hour after being “Tasered” by
    APD. According to the Statesman, there were 5 officers present to
    subdue the one reportedly uncooperative suspect. Given these odds, the
    police should have been able to subdue a single individual without
    having to use the second most deadly weapon in their arsenal. Instead,
    they used a lethal weapon on a single unarmed and outmanned suspect,
    and ended up killing him, as in the shooting of Daniel Rocha that
    occurred not 4 months ago. Contrary to statements by Chief Knee, such
    exaggerated use of force is not in accordance with APD policy, which
    calls for the “least amount of force necessary” to resolve a conflict.

    Now that more and more medical examiners nationwide are ruling that
    Tasers are a contributing cause, and in some cases, the primary cause,
    of deaths; since some segments of the law enforcement community are
    coming out AGAINST the weapon such as 2 divisions of the Department of
    Homeland Security having dsallowed their use and a national law
    enforcement-based class action suit against Taser, Int. has been
    brought forth – accusing the company of misleading the law enforcement
    community and the public in terms of safety; since the SEC is now fully
    investigating Taser Int., (after earlier this year announcing an
    inquiry into the safety of the product); and while TASER, INT.
    themselves admit they are lethal,* there is no logical reason to
    continue to use these poorly-designed and potentially lethal tools on
    the streets.

    While the City of Austin’s Human Rights Commission
    is hard at work on improving policy and oversight regarding the use of
    these lethal weapons, the City must act today by placing a moratorium
    on Taser use until further studies have been conducted and APD use of
    force policies and procedures have been further examined and revised.
    It is too late to help the second victim in Austin of Taser abuse by
    the APD, but we can prevent further deaths! We must implement an
    IMMEDIATE MORATORIUM on their use in Austin!


    Christian
    Hartwig, a very recent APD Taser victim, will be on hand to relay his
    story about how policy was broken when police on 6th St. repeatedly and
    simultaneously tasered him as a means to resolve a conflict that was no
    longer even taking place.

    *From a June 28 memo:
    "repeated, prolonged and/or continuous exposure to the Taser may cause
    strong muscle contractions that may impair breathin

    g and respiration,
    particularly when the [weapon’s metal] probes are placed across the
    chest or diaphragm…[which] may lead to death.” This is the first
    admittance that the weapon is, in fact, NOT non-lethal. This came out,
    certainly without coincidence, on the same day that the first medical
    examiner in the nation (in Chicago) ruled a Taser as the primary cause
    of death.

    Links related to above info:
    http://www.newsinferno.com/storypages/8-23-2005~001.html
    http://www.azcentral.com/business/articles/0927Taser27-ON.html
    http://www.tucsoncitizen.com/index.php?page=business&story_id=092605d1_taser