Category: Uncategorized

  • Choctaw Reader Replies

    Mr. Moses,

    I just read your article
    on "Bill Bennet’s Book of Cracker Virtues." I am what is called a
    Native American, and while I try to eschew bitterness (it’s not easy
    once you learn real history), I still appreciate the sarcastic humor
    you employed while stating the present reality.

    I especially liked the paragraph, "In Bennett’s concept of the
    American crime rate, of course, genocide never counts. Neither does
    theft of labor. With these two great and obvious categories of crime
    dismissed, the souls of white folk may then be quite easily imagined to
    have worked their way to Democracy in America by means of honest trade,
    fair elections, and saintly patience, never bothering no one, and only
    occasionally dismayed by inappropriate displays of ingratitude."

    Thanks,
    Larry Battiest
    Choctaw
    Bernalillo, NM

  • Heroes of the Local Road Earn Their Pay (And Then Some!)

    By Susan Van Haitsma

    In the grand scheme of things – we’re just travelers.
    Never kings, never queens – we’re just travelers.

    — from Big Moon Shinin’ by Chip Taylor

    AUSTIN, TX (Sept. 23)–I boarded the bus with renewed appreciation.
    Capital Metro operators were back after a one-day strike, and I was
    grateful to be able to take my usual route to work. When I told the
    driver that I supported the strike, he smiled and said with some
    excitement, “I think we made a difference!”

    I know that Capital Metro operators have made a positive difference
    in my life since the year I stopped driving a car. In 1990, I began
    using the city bus for most local transportation, and because my work
    takes me to different parts of town at different times of day, I’ve
    used almost every
    route at one time or another. I feel at home on the bus. It’s a small community on wheels, more
    richly diverse and more representative of the city as a whole than the
    neighborhood where I live. Buses are street-going vessels of the
    lifeblood of Austin, carrying workers, students, children and parents
    through arteries all over town. Bus riders learn about each other in
    ways that automobile drivers cannot. We talk to each other or just
    observe.

    On the bus, an atmosphere of helpfulness tends to develop that
    contrasts with the everyone-for-him-or-herself attitude often typifying
    automobile travel. Bus passengers lend one another a hand with bags of
    groceries and strollers, and pool their knowledge of routes and
    schedules for those who are new. When someone lacks the fare, riders
    dig in their pockets for change.

    My heroes of these rolling communities are the drivers. They carry
    precious cargo. They often begin or end shifts in the wee hours and
    handle the pressure of arriving at a day’s worth of stops neither too
    late nor too early while accommodating unexpected delays or detours.

    Drivers serve not only as navigators of large, complex machines,
    but they also interact with a large, complex public. I doubt whether
    the pay raises they are seeking take into account their roles as
    counselors, assistants or public relations representatives, but they do
    that work all the same. They
    assist new passengers with bike racks and fare boxes and help buckle
    seatbelts for riders in wheelchairs. They give directions to passengers
    who don’t have their bearings and may listen for miles to a talkative
    person in the front seat.

    Drivers take the heat when a bus is late or when a rider is just in
    a grumpy mood, but they’ll also wait a little longer at a stop when
    they see someone running, and they’ll signal a connecting bus so that a
    passenger can catch a transfer. I have seen drivers disarm disruptive
    passengers or expertly calm a bus full of rowdy students by stopping
    the bus and offering a few firm but respectful words.

    Some non-riders who have complained about the bus strike have taken
    union leaders to task for the timing of the strike, but those who
    criticize the union should note that their argument against the strike
    – that the services of transit union members are too vital to be halted
    – is also an argument in support of what the union is asking. Because
    the work of bus drivers
    and mechanics is essential to providing fair, sustainable and safe
    transportation for Austin area residents and visitors, these workers
    should have a contract that is fair, sustainable and safe for
    themselves and their families.

    Non-riders often refer to “empty buses,” yet in 15 years of riding
    Capital Metro, I have observed that the majority of cars passing
    alongside the bus are three quarters empty, an occupancy rate below
    most of the buses I ride. I am convinced that the bus is the more
    efficient people mover, especially considering the many hours those
    seats in cars remain vacant in parking lots while bus seats continually
    refill as buses circulate.

    Work stoppage is a time-honored, nonviolent negotiation strategy
    that highlights just how much we value the service that is withheld. I
    could not do without Capital Metro drivers. I trust them to take me
    where I need to go, and I trust their determination of what is fair
    compensation for that ride.

    —–

    Van Haitsma is a regular bus rider living in Austin.

  • Reader Replies to Bennett OpEd

    Note: this email is in response to an article called Bennett’s Book of Cracker Virtues published at OpEdNews:

    No one could say it better than you did here.

    Just want to add, that Bill Bennett is a contradiction, an oxymoron,
    and is true to his neocon ilk. Pro life he say he is. Not on your
    life!Especially if a person is black or of color.Abortion? White
    collar’s broke every law in the book.Picking what fetus should live or
    die? Indeed!

    Sincerely,
    Senior Citizen..Phila. PA

  • Border Lawyer for Undocumented ''Unaccompanied Minors''

    By Nick Braune
    Mid-Valley Town Crier
    by permission

    This week I interviewed Susan Watson, an energetic attorney with Texas RioGrande Legal Aid (TRLA) which has offices in Weslaco, Edinburg, and Harlingen.

    Braune: Your work has brought you into contact with special undocumented youth being detained by the government, “unaccompanied minors.” I suppose that means they came to this country by themselves. They sound like very brave youth, but they are still youth and must be pretty scared and maybe confused. Could you tell us something about these young people and how you meet up with them?

    Watson: Unaccompanied minors (UACs) are children under 18 without legal status and who have no parent or legal guardian present. Of the estimated 8,000 UACs who enter the United States each year, most come from Central America or Mexico. All of the UACs I’ve met come from horrific situations: some are orphaned, sometimes because their parents were killed in gang violence or by military factions; some were abused or abandoned by parents; others lived in abject poverty. They are, indeed, extremely brave: the stories I’ve heard about their lives and their harrowing trips to reach the U.S. include things most of us could never imagine.

    We at TRLA first became involved with UACs last year. We were contacted by immigration counsel for several children who were victims of sexual assault in a shelter facility in Nixon, Texas. The children needed representation for civil rights and other claims arising from their treatment there. Because TRLA has a long history of fighting for the poor and the vulnerable, our group was a good choice — and these kids probably are the most vulnerable and least likely to be able to seek justice on their own.

    Braune: Does ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) take charge of these youth? And how are they treated? I suppose there is a range: some are treated poorly and some are treated better. Right?

    Watson: In 2002, the responsibility for caring for UACs while they are in immigration proceedings was delegated to the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) of the U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services. This was done to separate the responsibilities of caring for these children (ORR) from prosecuting the immigration cases (ICE). Although some children are treated pretty well, far too many receive sub-standard care and are subjected to physical, sexual and emotional abuse.

    Braune: A related matter. If teens in custody turn 18, are they just thrown into the world to fend for themselves or are they deported? If they have no family with them and have just been released from the juvenile centers, they must be pretty distressed. Do they get some help from the government for health care, counseling, education, job hunting assistance, etc.?

    Watson: Detained UACs are transferred to adult detention facilities on their 18th birthdays, and then they may be eligible for release on bond. But you are right — they are just turned out on the street even if they have been in ORR custody for years. Until their immigration case is decided, most have no ability to work legally, are ineligible for public benefits, and find no system in place to provide them with basic human needs, such as shelter, food, and clothing. If bond is denied, the person remains in ICE detention until the immigration case is completed.

    Braune: I’ve heard that the Rio Grande Valley facilities are better than others around the country. Why is that?

    Watson: I can think of two reasons why these UAC facilities — about six are in the Valley — are generally better than others. First, and without meaning to sound stereotypical, the Valley is primarily Hispanic, and children are cared for by people from similar cultural backgrounds, Spanish speakers who understand the important cultural differences among regional groups.

    The second important reason is that members of ProBAR (South Texas Pro Bono Asylum Representation Project) of Harlingen, visit the facilities regularly, meeting with every child. Having an independent group in constant contact with the children significantly decreases the likelihood that abuse will occur or that it will go undetected.

    Braune: Lastly, is there one specific thing you would change immediately?

    Watson: If I could change only one thing, it would be to require independent monitoring and contact with all UACs, much like ProBAR does in the Valley. In addition to deterrence and early discovery of abuse or other care issues, having “outsiders” come in on a regular basis also provides children with knowledge of their rights and an assessment of potential immigration relief. Finally, it increases the possibility of getting pro bono legal representation, which dramatically affects a child’s ability to present a strong case in immigration court.

    Braune: Thanks, counselor, for your time today and your important work.

  • News of Immigrant Abuse Widely Ignored, So Far

    A headline in the Dallas Morning News fairly represents the tone and content of a story: “Tales of terrorists breaching border overblown, so far.” Indeed it is a long story about what “could” occur, but hasn’t occurred. A curious bit of news.

    On the other hand, immigrant families from around the world continue to be abused by USA immigration authorities in Dallas. And the stories continue to be widely ignored, so far.

    It has been some time since we’ve heard news of a happy ending, and we watch with distress as a recent case of abuse involving Rrustem Neza jolts down a darkening tunnel of climate controlled indifference. Not only are USA authorities trying to deport him, too; they are petitioning to dope him first.

    In all the cases we have shared at the Texas Civil Rights Review, the pattern is the same. Hard working, decent people crammed into a wringer without remorse. These exercises of American power cannot fail to provoke anger in a beating heart, and we have proved that hearts of Texas are beating.

    Yet, at some level of structural maladjustment a sinister formula requires that news of someone’s stated fears should overtop interest in the real suffering of the day. As another chance at a happy ending slips past.

    Against the discouragements of our continuing alliance with refugees and deportees, we quote John Rawls from “A Theory of Justice”:

    “Now one feature of a rational plan is that in carrying it out the individual does not change his mind and wish that he had done something else instead. A rational person does not come to feel an aversion for the foreseen consequences so great that he regrets following the plan he has adopted. . . . We may, of course, regret something else, for example, that we have to live under such unfortunate circumstances . . .” (421-422) –gm