Category: Uncategorized

  • Summer Reading: Benezet's Anti-Slavery Writings

    “Justice abhors punishing an innocent person; and if they are innocent why shall they not enjoy their natural rights as fully and absolute as the rest of mankind. Or is it their being born of a different colour from ourselves that gives us this prerogative of dealing with them as we please…”

    –Anthony Benezet

    From the remarkable recent collection of Benezet’s anti-slavery writings: To Be Silent Would be Criminal: the Anti-Slavery Influence and Writings of Anthony Benezet. Edited, with extensive prefatory notes, by Irv A. Brendlinger. Revitalization: Explorations in World Christian Movements. Pietist and Wesleyan Studies, No. 20. The Scarecrow Press; Lanham, MD; Toronto; and Plymouth, UK. And The Center for the Study of World Christian Revitalization and Movements. 2007.

    “we Christians introduced the Traffick of Slaves, and that before our coming they lived in Peace; but, say they, it is observable, that wherever Christianity comes, there comes with it a Sword, a Gun, Powder and Ball.”

    –William Smith, quoting a 1726 conversation with a European merchant in Africa (cited in Benezet’s 1762 “Short Account of Africa,” edited by Brendlinger 2007).

  • While Jay Walks to the Children of Hutto, Texas Walks Away

    Email from Jay J. Johnson-Castro.

    On April 13th we held the press conference at the Capitol…and did the first day of Hutto Walk II…to protest ICE and CCA’s imprisonment of innocent children in Taylor, TX. Not until today did I learn that Michele Adams, Policy Specialist for the Texas Department of Family and Child Protective Services EXEMPTED CCA and Hutto from the laws that protect families and children in Texas.

    But…thanks to a young journalist of the San Antonio Current…we now know. He shared the attached with me…as I now share them with you.

    As we endeavor to get the House Committee of State Affairs to allow a public hearing on HCR 64…it becomes even more sinister how corrupted this system is in protecting the immoral and criminal treatment of the children and their mothers from some 30 countries at the Hutto prison camp.

    Anyone who is remotely aware of how Hutto was prior to the Hutto Walk and Vigil in December, prior to the suit by the Texas Civil Rights Project, prior to the ACLU law suits, prior to the Women’s Commission’s condemnation of Hutto, prior to the editorial boards of the Austin American-Statesman and the Houston Chronicle…compare the attached letters. You’ll see flagrant and willful dishonesty. But…at least we have it in writing. And we have a copy of the DFPS in writing…just two weeks old.

    It is gut wrenching when one thinks of the Ibrahim family and the fact that the children had no access to their pregnant mother at night. I suspect that when some of you sift through this…there will be an outrages so hot that the Lege will feel the heat of spontaneous combustion.

    Is it yet time for an investigation by the Texas Attorney General, the Texas Rangers? How about the FBI? Who has the courage and the moral fiber to stand up to this immoral activity?

    I know some of you will know exactly what to do and with whom to share this information. I, for one, have said all along that anyone who is complicit with the imprisonment of these little children…should be indicted and serve in one of those cells in Hutto.

    Jay
    “No Child Left Behind Bars”
    FREE the CHILDREN
    jay@villadelrio.com
    (830)768-0768

  • LareDOS Newspaper Removed from Airport and City Hall

    Our liberty cannot be guarded but by the freedom of the press, nor that be limited without danger of losing it.” — Thomas Jefferson to John Jay, 1786.

    The First Amendment – Freedom of Religion, Press, Expression. Ratified 12/15/1791. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

    By MARIA EUGENIA GUERRA
    Publisher, LareDOS Newspaper

    Special to the Texas Civil Rights Review

    I am stung by the oddity that the Mayor of the City of Laredo chose to deal with our disparate points of view – his and mine — by ordering my newspaper removed from the City of Laredo Convention and Visitors Bureau puesto at Laredo International Airport, a spot at which I have left LareDOS every month for many, many years so that travelers and visitors to the airport can read up on the events of our community.

    There are so many aspects to his actions to consider. There’s the irony that he was on his way to Anaheim to take part in Laredo’s nomination as an All American City when he instructed the CVB employee to remove the papers and committed so egregious an un-American act as censorship of the press. There is the issue of his actions in violation of the City Charter which expressly forbids him as an elected official to instruct any City employee to perform any task. As it turns out he had also earlier instructed a City of Laredo employee at City Hall to do the same, something confirmed to radio host Jay St. John who asked the Mayor if he had really had the paper removed from the CVB desk at the airport, to which the Mayor answered, “Yeah, and the ones at City Hall, too.”

    There is the oddity that this elected public official, a former federal employee, an FBI agent, would have so little regard for the First Amendment (ratified in 1791) and my right to have an opinion, to be able to express it, and to be able to print and distribute a newspaper.

    There is the oddity that he called me the day before he had my papers removed, and we discussed not the removal of my papers from City edifices, but his dog Princess. He is bothered that she made two cameo appearances on the cover of LareDOS in recent months and he considers this an attack on his family. It’s important, to me, to note that for all the years I have lived in this, the city of my birth, we have never had a “First Dog” or a “First Lady.” The currency of those odd coins were minted not by us but by the Mayor, and as such carry on their meaning a vain self-importance that has become repugnant to many.

    There is the oddity that he would think for a nano second that ordering my papers removed from a public building paid for by my tax dollars and federal funds would for a second silence me in any measure.

    My small staff of earnest writers and I have had so many thoughts about this affront to the Constitution, this affront to us. We work hard as a team to produce one of the best-written and most respected news journals from here to Austin. I say this with not a brag in my voice; others in the brethren of the noble trade of advocacy journalism – which seeks to inform, to give voice to issues and new ideas, to foment debate – have said it of us.

    In the last few days we, as journalists, have all had an opinion about the Mayor’s trample on the First Amendment and specifically on our individual freedoms of expression. As we’ve conjured dictatorships that have quashed the free press – Papa Doc, Idi Amin, Sadaam Hussein, Hugo Chavez, to name just a few — we’ve no choice but to add Raul Salinas to that dishonorable company of paper thin-shelled tyrants.

    One member of my staff made a very fine point of the malice in the mayor’s actions – that of having so little disregard for the relationship of our paper with our advertisers. The Mayor meant to harm us, that is clear.

    It is incredible that the avowed leader of this city, a man who participates in huge decisions for a city and a country he professes so often to love, would lose sight of what makes this country great. All those God Bless America platitudes, all those unfocused soap box tirades about terrorism with which he consumes valuable City Council meeting time seem more than ever like hollow sentiments you use to fill up the air space when you are not really a leader, not really a visionary, not really respectful of the rights of others.

    To what can we attribute his disdain for the First Amendment? Low blood sugar? Flight anxiety? The strains of the job? The excitement of a junket at which his city might be named All American? I can’t come up with an explanation that eclipses the importance of the role of the freedom of the press in the expectation that government and elected officials perform in the best interest of those they serve.

    What was that trite campaign slogan of the Mayor’s – right man, right time? Mayor, wrong woman, wrong newspaper.

    LareDOS on the web

  • Archive: Keeper Quote from Judge Sam Sparks

    Concluding paragraphs to a March 22 ruling issued by Austin Federal Judge Sam Sparks–gm

    The court is troubled by the evidence presented at yesterday’s hearing, in particular by the evidence that Plaintiff’s right to private consultation with their attorneys is severely limited. Even in the penitentiary, lawyers can see their clients privately. Whatever the inconvenience may be to ICE, CCA, or any other organization in the alphabet soup responsible for the Hutto facility, this court finds it hard to imagine a legitimate reason for rules giving immigrant detainees fewer rights to counsel than federal felons.

    IT IS ORDERED that the restrictions on the number of clients that an attorney can see per visit and the requirement that children attend their parents’ attorney visits be REMOVED immediately.

  • Charania Materials Removed at Request of Family

    Dear Editor,

    The Coppell Citizen’s Advocate lists the Texas Civil Rights Review website as a place to find more information regarding the Charanias.
    However, it looks as if all of that information has been deleted and the articles are not on the website. This worries me as people are asking me where they are. If the articles cannot be put back on the website, is there an alternative place to go to find information?

    Thank you,
    Ashley Pitala


    Dear Reader,

    Yesterday [June 22] I received a request from the Charania family to promptly remove all items pertaining to their case from the Texas Civil Rights Review website. Let us hope this means that the end to their ordeal is near.

    Sincerely,
    Greg Moses
    Editor
    Texas Civil Rights Review