Editor’s Note: In the following letter to the ICE Director in Phoenix, immigration advocate Ralph Isenberg of Dallas, TX states his case for the immediate release of Hector Lopez from a detention facility in Florence, AZ.
In the letter Isenberg offers to take responsibility for any transportation or monitoring costs that would be involved in releasing the 21-year-old college student. Isenberg also discusses contradictions in immigration policy. On the one hand the President has announced a policy of discretionary lenience for undocumented college students who have grown up in the USA. On the other hand, immigration officials appear to be under continued pressure to meet deportation quotas.
Isenberg has been involved in immigration advocacy since the time he successfully campaigned to have his wife returned from China. Since that time, Isenberg has been active in the successful campaign to release all children from the T. Don Hutto detention center in Taylor, TX.
Isenberg is also active in efforts to return American dreamer Saad Nabeel to the USA where the young man will be able to complete his engineering studies and strive for admission to Stanford graduate school.
Meanwhile please share the need to send holiday cards to Hector for as long as he remains wrongfully detained. –gm
December 13, 2010
Field Office District Director
Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Phoenix, AZ 85004
RE: Hector Lopez A 074809057
Dear Ms. Kane:
I write in support of your office using the discretion it has to immediately release Hector Lopez. While not an attorney, I am familiar enough with current policy and procedure to know you have it within your power to honor my request.
I am willing to take responsibility for Hector and make certain that he has both shelter and the means to return to Arizona immediately should you require his presence. I am also willing to reimburse the government for reasonable expenses associated with alternative methods of detention like ankle bracelet, home call-in or home visit. It is incumbent that we bring a quick end to his detention.
Hector Lopez may not be an American citizen but he is as American as you or I. I believe that he finds himself detained through no fault of his making and perhaps even through no fault of his parents. As I understand the facts, his parents did in fact enter the United States without proper documentation but they later tried to correct that situation and become documented.
The parents dreamed of a day when they would all be Citizens of the United States. They hired a family attorney to handle their immigration matters who was later punished by the Bar of California for not notifying clients of pending immigration hearings. The family was ordered deported by an Immigration Judge for failure to attend a hearing that the Lopez family had no notice of. Hector was a mere child when this happened.
Ineffective assistance of counsel and failure to get notice are grounds that should result in the case being reopened. In the meantime, it is clear that you have it within your discretionary power to release Hector. There are other factors that I believe should weigh in his favor. The family has never hid from immigration or done anything to hide their identity. Their social security cards came from the Social Security Administration and their driver licenses came from the Oregon Department of Motor Vehicle.
The family has always paid taxes. Mr. Lopez worked for the same company for seventeen years and his wife worked in a similar fashion until three years ago when she opened a small family owned convenience store. Their two sons have always been model students. I also find it interesting that the Lopez children do not speak Spanish. Their parents raised them to know and understand only one culture. That culture is the American way. This is the type of family every American would welcome as their next door neighbor. Hector is a person of the highest moral character and will not be a flight risk. I trust the above stated is sufficient evidence to compel you take do the right thing and release Hector.
I also believe that the deportation of Hector was flawed because Hector Lopez is a Dream Act student. Less than two weeks before Hector was deported, the President of the United States delivered a speech at the University of Texas that stated Dream Act students would not be deported. On the same day, the New York Times reported that the Obama Administration would not be deporting Dream Act students. “In a world of limited resources, our time is better spent on someone who is here unlawfully and is committing crimes in the neighborhood,” John Morton, the head of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, said, according to the New York Times. “As opposed to someone who came to this country as a juvenile and spent the vast majority of their life here.” During the same period of time scores of Dream Act students have been granted various kinds of deferred action by District Directors, such as yourself, around the country.
I have been at a loss to explain why Hector was deported until I read the Washington Post last week. In an article entitled “Unusual Methods Helped ICE Break Deportation Record” it was reported that ” ICE officials realized in the final weeks of the fiscal year, which ended Sept. 30, that the agency still was in jeopardy of falling short of last year’s mark, they scrambled to reach the goal. Officials quietly directed immigration officers to bypass backlogged immigration courts and time-consuming deportation hearings whenever possible, internal emails and interviews show. ICE also ran a Mexican repatriation program five weeks longer than ever before”. I find it interesting that the Seattle District Office might have been under unusual pressure to produce results in that they had a new Director assume office in July of 2010. Hector Lopez was deported at the height of this deportation frenzy. We owe it to Hector to grant him relief if there is one shred of truth to the Washington Post report.
As for the asylum claim, I believe it best to let the experts interview Hector and determine for themselves whether his fears are real. Obviously, he is at a distinct disadvantage being forced to live in a culture that he neither speaks the language nor understands. The fact that he would rather sit in a detention center in Arizona than be free in Mexico speaks volumes about what must be going on in his mind. When I read the headlines that speak of the terror going on in Mexico I am thankful he is out of there. The violence in not limited to a certain part of the country. I also know that the Department of State still has active travel advisories associated with these conditions.
The danger to Hector is not just gang related. There are political parties, currently not in power, that blame and target everything American. Such activity is particularly present on various university campuses around Mexico. I question how Hector can get a quality education in Mexico and not find himself in danger. I am confident that if Hector is treated fairly, unlike what happened to him at the border when a Border Patrol Agent tried to fool him into signing deportation documents, he will be granted asylum. Beyond the asylum claim, I believe Hector is eligible for other forms of relief. Hector Lopez is deserving of your help. To hide behind the use of discretion, when it is available to you, for cases like this would not be right.
Family unification has been a fundamental cornerstone of our immigration policy since inception. It is basic to our way of life and must not be ignored. Too often those involved in immigration tend to forget the words of our forefathers as expressed in the Constitution of the United States and the Bill of Rights. “Due process of law is something that applies to all people that happen to find themselves on our soil. Too often those involved in immigration tend not to ask what was the intent of Congress when asked to make a decision. Congress has always given the immigration decision makers broad discretionary powers for a reason. We know that no two immigration cases are ever alike and that some fall between the cracks of common reasoning and are deserving of special attention and action. Such is the case of Hector Lopez.
Allow me to discuss one doctrine which I think speaks directly to the case of Hector Lopez. We have on our books a form of relief known as Humanitarian Reinstatement. I realize that the rules speak to when someone is applying for admittance to this country and the petitioner dies. But I also feel that the evaluating criteria used for such requests is powerful and shows the intent of Congress when it comes to families. The factors that our Congress asks immigration officials to consider are very much on point to the case of Hector Lopez.
It is clear there has been a disruption of an established family unit. There is also an extreme hardship created for the younger Lopez child who is an American citizen. Hector has no home to go to. It would also appear that there is going to be delays associated with processing his case. Finally, Hector has strong family ties in the United States. I believe these ties go beyond his immediate family and include his girlfriend, friends, classmates, fellow workers and the community at large. Surely there must be some provision within the massive discretions you have that can be granted to Hector.
To Hector you are the most powerful person in the world. With the stroke of a pen you can set him free and give this young man his freedom back. Hector has demonstrated great courage so far. He has done everything asked of him. I am very proud of him. He is my hero. His detention must end now. I always say that in life there is right and there is wrong and there is the right thing to do. In my heart I have got to believe you understand what I am talking about and will do the right thing.