Category: Ramsey Muniz

  • Ramsey Muniz: An Unreasonable Mexicano

    Dear Friends: Enclosed is the first of several letters written by Ramsey Muniz while in solitary confinement at the Oklahoma Transfer Center in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Conditions there were torturous, as described by Ramsey. Please distribute.–Irma L. Muniz
    ****************************************

    5/11/06

    Writings from Solitary Confinement

    The writings come from the depth of my Mexicano spiritual corazon. Even though I find myself in this cold dark hole of America, the spirit to rise and share with my people that the time has come for us to seize. I see no faces. I only encounter the concrete walls and steel beds of oppression and injustice. Yet I’m not saddened because my mind and Mexicano corazon are filled with the spirituality of our liberation here in America once and for all.

    I’m filled with the spirits of our sisters and brothers from our Holy Land (Mexico) who took to the streets in millions like never before. The entire world viewed with amazement that maybe the United States was not a country of the free. Why should I have to be constantly confined in the dark cold holes of this system? The faces I saw on the national TV news were the majority of young faces, which means the struggle for justice and freedom can take as long as it has to. Those same faces in the streets will be there for a long time to come.

    When one struggles for justice, liberation and spirituality, you never truly become old. One becomes
    younger at heart and mind, simply because you are seeking the truth and the truth this very day is setting our people, la raza, los Mexicanos/Mexicanas free.

    And why has the Bureau of Prisons denied me medical care and treatment for the last eleven years? Why? For the first time, we Mexicanos have become a national presidential issue in the United States. Hispanics, Latinos, and national Hispanic organizations
    should take a strong position in favor of amnesty for
    our sisters and brothers of our Holy Land. Please do
    not allow these politicians or the congress to think
    that we are different. Our roots, our most powerful
    ancient God-given roots all go back to the same source.

    We were not in existence only yesterday. We were
    here long before the creation of the United States.
    We are not strangers to this land. We must learn to
    be patient with each other. We have been physically,
    mentally, and spiritually divided for almost 500
    years. There is a lot of self-hatred and ignorance
    in our hearts and we must overcome the latter in
    order to win. At this point, we as a people are the
    only ones that can be destructive to each other.
    Families must bond once again. Blood and heart are
    the strongest elements in mankind. We must set aside
    all the petty differences and not become a soap
    opera destructive force. La familia must rise once
    again. La familia must reunite. La familia must
    embrace again!

    I decided to express my constitutional right,
    and petitioned the court to direct the federal medical
    facility to provide medical care and treatment.
    Instead, the staff in Springfield, Missouri took my
    body in chains and shackles and tonight I find myself
    in solitary confinement in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

    They stated that on one, especially a Mexican like
    myself, would file any petition against them. Is
    this the true meaning of American justice?

    Even tonight with the token lighting, as I share these
    words from my heart, I can feel the spirits of our
    Mexicano revolutionary hero, Ricardo Flores Magon,
    who also suffered in the dungeons of Leavenworth and who died there – or is he really dead? I live within
    all the spirits and love of our past revolutionary
    Mexicanos and Mexicanas. They never permit for me
    to feel alone, lonely, or isolated from those close
    to my life. I only become stronger in my beliefs,
    convictions, and principles because the Oppressor
    continues to violate my human rights by any means
    necessary. I only feel for my wife, my family, and
    those close to my heart after so many years of
    suffering and sacrifice.

    The nights are extremely cold and painful to
    my body, yet they refuse to give me a blanket. I
    will survive because it is written in our ancient
    past that we must sacrifice to the end. Why is it
    so cold and dark in this hole, and why must I suffer
    in this cruel fashion?

    We must learn to openly communicate with our
    Holy Land of Mexico and its governing body. For too
    long the Holy Land has separated itself from its own
    people who lived in Aztlan (Southwest). A national
    delegation of Mexicanos and Mexicanas should be
    organized for the purpose of presenting its agenda
    to the president and Congreso de Mexico. Remember
    and don’t ever forget that we are all the same people.
    Todos somos uno! The day that we as a people accept
    each other as one is that day that we shall be free
    in this world of today and tomorrow.

    Forgiveness: We as a people, as a Mexican race
    are in the immediate process of recognizing and
    accepting who we are once again. For decades the
    oppressor has made us believe we are different,
    simply because a border divided us for many
    years. We must learn to forgive each other for
    the blindness and/or acceptance of thinking we
    were different. We are one and shall be one
    forever! Nothing can change that. It is part of
    our nature and most importantly it is God-given.
    “Todos Somos Uno” will be our new cry to the
    world and to those around us. We are in for new
    ideas, philosophies, thoughts, action, and
    organizing and we must come with an open heart
    and love for our people.

    “The reasonable man adapts himself to the
    world: The unreasonable one persists in trying
    to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all
    progress depends on the unreasonable man.”

    –George Bernard Shaw

    One could say that I’m an unreasonable
    Mexicano. Be it so, especially since I have
    witnessed and experienced oppression, discrimination,
    and injustices. If some doubt my words, then tell
    me why I am confined in this cold dark hole and
    will be in this hole until who knows when. My
    sisters and brothers from our Holy Land of Mexico
    have also suffered for coming into the land which
    was once ours. Some are even confined in the holes…

    I will never surrender the love and devotion
    I have in my heart for the freedom of our people.
    We must forever sacrifice and endure the
    suffering it takes for liberation and justice
    within mankind. History throughout the world
    states that some will have to sacrifice and carry
    the cross of freedom, love, and spirituality. I
    have accepted that part of history from the t
    ime of my birth. My mother, Hilda, was a Mexicana
    freedom fighter to the day of her death. I continue
    to carry that cross in my heart and body, for she
    is with me this very night sharing these words with
    all our people!

    In exile,
    Ramsey (Tez)
    Libertad y Aztlan!!
    *************************************

    http://www.freeramsey.com

  • The Cruel and Unusual Punishment of Ramsey Muniz

    Dear Friends:

    This letter from Ramsey Muniz describes the
    violation of his constitutional rights for
    the past eleven years. We continue to make
    this information known, and have received
    encouraging support from congressmen.
    Please distribute. — Irma L. Muniz

    4/7/06

    Violation of my Constitutional Rights Under the Eighth Amendment – Cruel and Unusual Punishment

    Before reading this constitutional opinion,
    it is important that you first examine the attached
    medical narrative (exhibit A), sent by
    Dr. Pete E. Garcia, in charge of the Orthopedic
    Surgery and Sports Medicine Clinic, to the Warden
    at the United States Penitentiary in Leavenworth,
    on February 1, 1995. If necessary, one will be able to find in
    my federal sentencing transcript where
    unmistakably I be confined in a Federal
    Correctional Institution (FCI), and not in a
    hard core federal penitentiary. The Bureau of
    Prisons and the United States Marshall’s Office
    disregarded the legal intentions of the federal
    judge, and instead confined me in the Leavenworth
    Federal Penitentiary.

    From the commencement of my incarceration,
    I was suffering from my physical disability and
    medical conditions. I constantly complained to
    the institutional medical authorities about my
    physical condition to the conclusion that I could
    not levitate from my bunk bed for days, suffering
    extreme spasms, arthritic pain, inflammatory
    rheumatism, distress, agony, and affliction.
    This cruel and unusual punishment continued for
    a period of over eleven (11) years.

    On or about 1996, due to the weakness and
    physical disabilities of my knees, I incurred a
    most drastic fall and injured my left hip. After
    various days confined to my bunk bed, several
    inmates provided assistance in carrying me to the
    institutional medical facility. The result was the
    same as before. X-rays were not taken, a full
    medical examination was not provided, and the only
    remedy was aspirin and a cane, which I use to this
    very day. The continuous denial of proper medical
    attention and care for the last ten (10) years
    pertaining to my hip was a violation of my
    constitutional right – cruel and unusual punishment.

    On August 22, 2005, I became extremely ill to
    the point that I was carried on a stretcher to the
    institutional medical facility in Leavenworth.
    After four hours of examinations, they finally
    decided that I be submitted to St. John’s Hospital
    in Kansas City, Kansas. What was to be a simple
    overnight operation resulted in a near death
    medical situation. From St. John’s Hospital I
    was transferred to Pawnee Hospital, and In turn
    I was transferred to Providence Hospital for
    surgery once again. Only five days after the
    operation, I was chained, shackled, and transferred
    to this present medical facility for federal
    prisoners in Springfield, Missouri.

    I continue to complain about my existing
    physical condition – knees, left hip, and back
    condition due to a large herniated disc. I persist
    with the assistance of my family and attorney that
    x-rays be initiated of my left hip and knees. After
    performing an x-ray of my hip, they found that it
    had to be replaced and should have been medically
    attended to years ago.

    Since my severe illness of August 22, 2005,
    I have been on a liquid diet because of my dentures.
    Only two weeks ago I began to eat properly, but
    I continue to be extremely physically weak and not
    in a medical position to undergo an immediate hip
    surgery.

    An attorney, my family, and others have
    respectfully requested that my hip operation be
    delayed for a reasonable time so that I may recover
    my physical, emotional, and mental strength.

    It is of record that the Springfield medical
    staff authorities have not yet shared with me the
    medical evaluation report submitted by Dr. Pete Garcia, Orthopedic Surgeon of Corpus Christi, Texas, nor have they taken x-rays of both my knees. To continue denying full medical evaluation and proper professional care at this medical facility is a continuous violation of my eighth amendment — cruel and unusual punishment.

    As a graduate of Baylor School of Law and a
    practicing attorney for many years (prior to my
    unjust confinement), it is my legal opinion and
    position that I be remain confined to this United
    States Medical Center for Federal Prisoners in
    Springfield, Missouri, until I am medically
    examined and treated for both my knees. To do
    otherwise or attempt to confine me once again
    in a United States penitentiary instead of a
    low level institution (FCI) would be a blatant
    violation of my constitutional rights pertaining
    to cruel and unusual punishment.

    How much more must I suffer after more than
    ten years of extreme and severe punishment. I am
    63 years old and in pursuit of justice in the
    United States of America’s constitution.

    In exile,

    Ramsey R. Muniz

    *****************************

    www.freeramsey.com

  • Ramsey Muniz: We Are Not Strangers to this Land

    Dear Friends:

    We must never cease the struggle for freedom.
    In the enclosed writings, Ramsey Muniz shares his
    knowledge and insight regarding the issue of immigration. Please distribute. — Irma L. Muniz

    We Are Not Strangers to This Land

    Even though I find myself confined in the
    dungeons of America, I marvel at the spirituality
    of liberation and justice that my Mexicano sisters
    and brothers are seeking after so many generations
    and years. As I witness the millions of nuestra
    gente proudly marching with that glow in their faces,
    demonstrating the love in their hearts, I clearly
    recall the last words of our last Mexicano Emperor
    – Huey Tlahtoani Kuauhtemoktzin – Cuauhtemoc:

    “Now we mandate our children also not to forget
    to transmit to their children how it will be, how
    we will reunite, how we will rise again, how we
    will reach out, and how we will fulfill the great
    destiny of our race.”

    America was taken by surprise as our sisters
    and brothers marched in its streets. They were
    surprised not only by the numbers, but by the
    truthful statements echoed by our people.

    Without question or doubt, the issue is one
    of our people staying here in the United States.
    However, we are also encountering a bigger,
    spiritual issue at this time in history. We are
    finally coming together as a race, as a people,
    raza, gente in all Aztlan, in the United States,
    and in our Holy Land of Mexico. For the longest
    time in history the oppressor has made us think
    that we are different. Some would argue that due
    to the place of birth, whether in the
    United States or the Holy Land of Mexico, we
    are different. It is extremely sad that throughout
    the long existence of our people we have looked
    upon ourselves as different races. The oppressor’s
    objective will forever be to divide the races
    and ultimately conquer.

    We must not be impatient with those who will
    claim they are not Mexicanos, and that they never
    will be. At the same time we must be patient with
    our sisters and brothers from our Holy Land who
    don’t understand why our people became Hispanic,
    Latinos, Chicanos, and Mexican Americans. The
    important thing is that the time has come for us
    to come together as one once again. “Todos
    somos uno” should be the theme of today, tomorrow,
    and our future. If we can come together as one
    race in the prisons of America, then there is no
    question that we can accomplish the same in the
    so-called free world of today.

    We must never forget our Mexicano blood. The
    Spanish invaders thought they subjugated our
    flesh with whips and swords, the French with
    guns and priests, but there is another separate
    world beneath our feet, above our heads, and
    dwelling in our Meixcano souls. From the beginning
    our creation as a race / people / gente, we have
    been one with the land of Aztlan. Even today in
    the 21st century the spirits of our ancient gods
    are everywhere. They are in every stone, every
    bird in the trees, the grass, the maize on the
    stalk, the water in the lakes, and the fish in
    the streams.

    Yes, the invaders conquered only
    what the eye could see, not ever understanding
    that from the time of our creation it was
    prophesized that we would overcome all invaders
    in our land, and we would rise once again. The
    oppressor has never conquered our spirituality
    and the power of our ancient cultura, which were
    the foundations of our existence and recreation.
    We are not strangers to this land in which they
    refer to us as illegal aliens and/or immigrants.
    We must never forget to continue teaching our
    youth of today and tomorrow the truth of our
    Mexicano history. We must share with the youth
    that it is written in our ancient manuscripts
    that one day we would return to the sacred place
    of our creation/existence as a race — Aztlan,
    “land that has risen.”

    We as Mexicanos of the 21st century must
    take a strong political stand against the
    creation of a so-called “Berlin wall” separating
    the borders. It is not about the war against
    terrorists at this point. It is about keeping
    our people out of the land which truthfully
    cries out. America must remember that we did
    not cross an ocean to arrive in what was first
    called Aztlan by our ancestors. It is written
    in our ancient prophecies that the land (Aztlan)
    would call for us to return.

    I never miss the national news, seeking
    what it has to comment about the immigration
    issue. Regardless of what the Republicans
    and/or Democrats state about this most
    profound issue, deep in my heart and mind I
    know that at the end we shall overcome whatever
    they decide to do with our people. We shall
    overcome the rounding up of our people as if
    we were animals. We shall overcome the
    structure of a wall at the border. We shall
    overcome the imprisonment of our sisters and
    brothers because of immigration policies. We
    shall overcome at the end because we are not
    strangers of this land, which was ours at one
    time. The land calls upon our hearts to return
    and to rise once again. Truth which pertains
    to the land is on our side and history has it
    that truth shall win!!!

    The entire world is in some sort of conflict.
    Even in war, and if one studies the issues closely,
    land becomes the reason for oppression, freedom,
    imprisonment, justice, and humanity. It is our
    duty and honor to support the efforts by our
    sisters and brothers in seeking the spiritual,
    cultural, and political right to reside in the
    United States of America.

    Even though I’m in this mode of darkness,
    I sleep as if I were newly born, knowing that
    the truth of our existence and creation has
    enlightened the entire world. The world knows
    that el Mexicano / Mexicana has risen with the
    power of truth in his heart and mind.

    What a time to be alive! Do we as
    Mexicanos of our Sixth Sun dare to scale the
    heights of heaven of Aztlan and our most sacred
    Holy Land of Mexico? Que viva la raza!

    America:

    “We want only to show you something
    We have seen and tell you something
    We have heard. That here and there
    In the world and now and then in ourselves
    Is a new spiritual/cultural Mexicano creation.”

    In exile,

    Ramsey Muniz – Tezcatlipoca

    *************************

    www.freeramsey.com

  • Yes, the State Does Misbehave: Ramsey Muniz Hints at Federal Challenge

    Note: the following letter from Ramsey Muniz (forwarded by his spouse) hints that the Leavenworth prisoner may soon mount a federal appeal of his conviction and sentencing on marijuana related charges.–gm

    ***************

    The enclosed letter was written by Ramsey Muniz. It is
    a legal response written to a person who expressed disbelief
    in our government resorting to such tactics as framing individuals.–Irma Muniz (via email Jan. 18, 2005)

    ***************

    October 19, 2005

    Dear Mr. Ochoa:

    Your letter shows that you’re different from those
    who make a hobby of being interested, including seekers
    after causes and people who like to get their names of
    letterheads. The sincerity expressed in your letter has
    developed a profound respect from me. However, while I
    sincerely respect your honest opinion, I must disagree
    with the basis supporting your assertion that you don’t
    believe me because, on your own words, you haven’t seen
    your government doing such things to others, including
    those who are more dangerous than myself.

    The reason for your radical position is only one,
    which is "misinformation." The words "public confidence
    in the criminal justice system," most of the time are
    used to justify releasing someone who has had his constitutional
    rights trampled on by government agents.

    Of course, this bad side of the government, when this
    is disclosed by a criminal defendant, apparently never
    meets the necessary credibility of citizens who cannot
    understand that our democratic system demands that
    government officials shall be subject to the same rules
    of conduct that are common to the citizen. See
    Olmstead v United States, 277 U.S. 433, 585, 48 S.Ct.
    575 (1928). The government’s misconduct in criminal
    cases has been well documented in the American justice
    system, causing expressions from courts as "there comes
    a time when enough is more than enough – it is just too
    much." Williamson v. United States, 311 F.2d 411, 445
    (5th Cir. 1962) (a contingent fee informer case).

    Although you are now aware, the existence of misconduct
    involving misbehaving officials, as in my case, has been
    well documented in the American Jurisprudence. Under
    clearly established federal law, the government violates
    a defendant’s right to due process when it fails to
    disclose evidence favorable to the accused prior to trial
    and the evidence is "Material either to guilt or to
    punishment, irrespective of the good faith or bad faith
    of the prosecution." Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83,
    87 (1963). In addition, the Supreme Court has long
    recognized that "A prosecutor’s knowing presentation
    of false testimony is ‘inconsistent with the rudimentary
    demands of justice.’" Jacobs v. Scott, 513 U.S. 1067 1995)
    (Stevens, J., dissenting from denial of petition for
    writ of certiorari) (quoting Mooney v. Holohan,
    294 U.S. 102, 112 (1935)).

    As a result, due process is violated when a
    prosecutor fails to correct testimony that he knows
    to be false, even when the falsehood goes only to the
    witness’s credibility. Alcorta v. Texas, 355 U.S. 28,
    31 (1957) (per curiam); Napue v. Illinois, 360 U.S. 264,
    269 (1959). These principles illustrate "the special role
    played by the American prosecutor in the search for truth
    in criminal trials." Strickler v. Greene, 527 U.S. 263,
    281 (1999). In our system, the prosecutor’s role
    "transcends that of an adversary; [the prosecutor] ‘is
    the representative not on an ordinary party to a
    controversy, but a sovereignty…whose interest…in a
    criminal prosecution is not that it shall win a case,
    but that justice shall be done.’" United States v. Bagley,
    473 U.S. 667, 675 (1985) (quoting Berger v. United States,
    295 U.S. 78, 88 (1935)).

    As you many now understand, without having solid and
    irrefutable evidence that my conviction was obtained by
    misbehaving (government) officials, any claim of such
    wrongdoing would be, under the law, ridiculous and a
    waste of time. The filing of a motion for a new trial,
    in my case, will be based on recently discovered evidence
    (undisclosed by the government at trial) proving such
    allegations. After the filing of the motion in a federal
    court, the evidence supporting my claim will be public
    record, and you, as well as many others, will receive a
    copy of such motion. Accordingly, I believe that at this
    time your radical position against the credibility of
    my cause is somewhat …premature?

    Your letter, however, has a profound value for my
    cause. For ordinary citizens, interest is a necessary
    condition of influence. When they communicate concerns
    with respect to the credibility of my allegations, they
    become more influential.

    Please receive my most sincere gratitude for your
    very welcome correspondence.

    Sincerely,

    Ramiro R. Muniz

    ******************

    http://www.freeramsey.com

  • New Evidence in the Ramsey Muniz Case

    Note: the following email from Irma Muniz passes along a claim by her
    husband Ramsey that new evidence has been discovered about the
    circumstances surrounding his 1994 arrest for marijuana trafficking.–gm
    —————

    Dear Friends:
    What would any person with a past conviction do upon being
    SUDDENLY PURSUED FOR NO REASON after having gotten
    out of a car he had just been asked to move? What would he
    choose to do with the car key? Ramsey had only seconds
    to think as he quickly rushed to a pay phone to try
    and reach an attorney. In the rush he thought,
    "If I give them the key, it is giving consent to search
    a car that doesn’t even belong to me. If I keep the key,
    it will implicate me in something." He never made it.
    If this was done to Ramsey in 1994, why shouldn’t one
    believe that the same happened in his first conviction?

    The enclosed is an excerpt of a letter from Ramsey Muniz in
    response to a letter received regarding his case against
    the United States government. Please forward this letter
    to students in Chicano studies programs, Mexicano law students,
    law student associations, civil rights organizations,
    and listservs. All interested parties may contact the
    National Ramsey Defense Alliance for additional information.

    –Irma Muniz
    *****************

    August 14, 2004

    Dear Armando:
    Shakespeare said, "as the waves make towards the
    pebbled shore, so do our minutes hasten to their end."
    (Sonnet LX). The loss of our friend, Raul, shows us a
    very important fact about life, a fact we must remember.
    "Life goes on forever toward its end, never slowing down
    or going back. Our lives do indeed ‘hasten to their
    end.’" (The Movement of Time – Shawn Waddell).

    During my almost eleven years in one of American’s
    arduous prisons, I have shared the cultural endeavor
    that we, Los Mexicanos, have organized throughout the
    entire southwest within the state and federal prison
    systems of America. Raul, outside, was a clear example
    of what Los Mexicanos can do in this country. Here, and
    from here, my beliefs and principles against the
    oppression and discrimination toward nuestra gente have
    been strongly expressed – more strongly than ever. For
    this reason, I will never give up on claiming that my
    trial was not conducted fairly. Of course, you are
    correct by stating that circumstantial evidence tying
    me with that vehicle was the basis for my conviction.
    And certainly, all the courts are expected to give
    deference to jury findings, regardless of my explanation
    to the contrary. But your very welcome opinion is based
    on a relitigation "doctrine," which is not the basis for
    reopening my case. Let me explain.

    Evidence only discovered a few months ago shows a
    link, prior to my "alleged participation," between the
    government and a confidential informant (the owner of
    the load found in the vehicle in question), who was
    recompensed for setting me up in this case. Of course,
    neither Dick (my trial counsel) nor I knew of this
    evidence. In Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419 (1995), the
    Supreme Court reviewed the standard for granting
    collateral relief where the materiality of suppressed
    evidence was considered. In sum, the court held that
    a "reasonable probability" of a different result is
    shown when the government’s evidentiary suppression
    undermines confidence in the outcome of the trial.
    115 S. Ct. at 1566. As you know, Kyles’ holding has
    been the subject of explanation and exploration in
    subsequent courts of appeal decisions.

    For example, in United States v. Smith, 77 F.3d
    511 (D.C. Cir. 1996), the court reversed drug related
    convictions nothing that, post Kyles, materiality
    [of suppressed] information is not gauged by a
    sufficiency-of-the-evidence test, 77 F.3d at 512,
    citing Kyles. In other words, the
    evidence in my case showing that my conviction "hinged"
    on a key hidden in my sock, which tied me to the loaded
    vehicle, would be irrelevant under Kyles. In Smith,
    the reversing panel described the holding in Kyles,
    noting "a reviewing court must focus on the fairness
    of the trial the defendant actually received rather
    than on whether a different result would have occurred
    had the undisclosed evidence been revealed." Accordingly,
    the question here is whether in the absence of this
    evidence, did I receive a fair trial, within the meaning
    of Kyles.

    As to whether Blakely applies to my case or not, any
    response to that would be premature. First the Court must
    effectively overrule McMillan, 447 U.S. 79, something it
    has twice declined to do, and hold that Blakeley applies
    to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. Second, any
    favorable ruling in this matter must be retroactively
    applied before I put my horses to run. Although it is
    possible to argue that under Tyler v. Cain, 533 U.S.
    656 (2001), in which the Court held that a new rule of
    criminal procedure may be retroactive through a series
    of that Court’s cases (the combination of Schriro v. Summerlin,
    U.S. June 24, (No. 03-526, 2004 WL 1402732 at *5-7), and
    Winship,) the Schriro’s Court’s conclusion that Ring v. Arizona
    should not be applied retroactively is a problem. The only
    difference between Ring and Blakely is the name of the state
    (Arizona-Washington), and apparently, more important
    (considering Teague’s prong against retroactivity), the
    involvement of a lower standard of proof which undermines
    the accuracy of the proceeding’s outcome.

    Because the Arizona law (in Ring) already required
    aggravating factors to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt,
    it appears that arguably, in Schriro, the majority’s analysis
    against retroactivity was limited to the Ring rule. But I don’t
    need to torture my brain with this question, after all, "if a
    precedent of the Court has direct application in a case, yet
    appears to rest on reasons rejected in some other line of
    decisions," it is the Supreme Court who has "the prerogative
    of overruling its own decisions." Rodriguez, 490 U.S. at 484
    (1989); State Oil Co. v. Khan, 522 U.S. 3, 20 (1997) (same).
    Thus, I must wait. If I see a good chance, surely, without
    doubt, I will be part of that fight. For now, however, the
    Kyles argument is my main target.

    Thank you for taking the time to inquire about my case.
    You will be constantly in our prayers for strength of
    your Mexicayotl (consciousness).

    Sincerely,

    Ramiro R. Muniz
    **********************

    http://www.freeramsey.com