Category: Uncategorized

  • The ''Send 'Em Back'' Song: Not What You'd Think

    At planet flamenco com, they have posted Teye and Belen’s appeal for a Christmas Eve vigil at Hutto jail (5-6 pm) along with lyrics from a song by The Foremen, “Send ‘Em Back”–back to Europe, that is.

    http://www.planetflamenco.com/

    The Official Foremen Website Well, Columbus found this nation
    Had a native population
    Who’d been living here since many years B.C.
    Descended from a people who were noble, brave and daring
    Who’d migrated ‘cross the Bering eating bits of frozen herring
    And spread out across this continent from sea … to sea … so peaceful and so free …

    Send ’em back
    Send ’em back
    Put ’em on a trek Columbo couldn’t track
    Let ’em count the steps to China on a friggin’ abacus
    Restrict immigration
    And give this mighty nation
    Back to us … squirrels

  • Houston Chronicle Seeks further De-Segregation at A&M

    “Ethnic diversity, however, is the ongoing challenge with the most potential to make or break A&M. The wrong president, or one who cannot galvanize the university to pursue this goal, could one day relegate A&M to the academic margins. A&M’s need for diversity is not a matter of fashion. Instead, A&M’s student and faculty makeup directly reflect its relevance for other Texans. Since 2002, Gates’ leadership increased Latino and black enrollment 86 percent and 48 percent respectively. It’s an impressive gain, but tempered by the reality that A&M’s black and Hispanic enrollment languishes at 14 percent. The Texas taxpayers who fund A&M are 50.2 percent minority.”
    excerpt from ‘Diversify student body’, Houston Chronicle Editorial (Dec. 14, 2006)

    Editor’s reminder: Ethnic diversity at A&M is the proximate cause for the existence of the Texas Civil Rights Review, once when it was founded in 1997 and again when it was revived in 2003. In both cases, we were motivated by a need to present stories that were not (and have never been) covered by the Houston Chronicle.–gm

  • Time to Stop the Propaganda of Hate

    In response to an editorial in the Austin American-Statesman (pasted below under “Read More”), Dallas attorney John Wheat Gibson fired off the following email.

    It is his second email to the Statesman in two days. The first one tried to correct the erroneous claim that frames the editorial in the second sentence: the claim that immigrants jailed at Hutto belong to families who entered the USA illegally. Gibson’s clients, two Palestinian families, entered with visas and applied for asylum.

    In the email below, Gibson works on another phrase, and we quote:

    “Age of terrorism,” my ass. The incarceration of the Palestinian families at Hutto has nothing whatsoever to do with terrorism, except that they came to the United States fleeing terrorism by the Israeli Occupation Forces in Palestine. It has absolutely nothing to do with “keeping tabs on illegal immigrants.” The Department of Homeland Stupidity at all times knew the correct address–had “tabs on”–the victims, because the scrupulously reported promptly every change in their addresses to the Department.
    Nobody wants to admit that their leaders might do evil. Germans hearing of atrocities in the 1930s would say, “Der Furher does not know about it. He would put a stop to it if he did.”

    But the fact is that, as the Germans learned and I hope we Americans are not too stupid to be learning, that governments do lie and terrorize their own populations for political purposes and to silence dissent.

    There is no legitimate purpose whatsoever in keeping the Palestinian children or their parents in prison in Hutto or anywhere else. The roundup on November 3 when they were arrested at their homes was nothing more or less than a Kristalnact terror aimed at the American people, as the press release the DHS issued makes clear in calling these children “criminals and absconders”.

    It is time the Statesman faced reality and stopped cooperating with the DHS’s anti-Muslim hate propaganda, of which the incarceration of children is only one recent, but particularly cynical example.

    John Wheat Gibson, P.C.

    Dallas, Texas

    http://www.statesman.com/opinion/content/editorial/stories/12/19/19taylor_edit.html

    EDITORIAL
    Putting children behind bars in Taylor

    EDITORIAL BOARD
    Tuesday, December 19, 2006

    There has to be a better way. It cannot be right to imprison children guilty of nothing more than following their parents into the United States illegally.

    The American-Statesman’s Juan Castillo recently reported on a private prison in Williamson County where families of illegal immigrants are held to await disposition of their cases. It is one of two Immigration and Customs Enforcement facilities in the United States holding non-Mexican unauthorized immigrants on noncriminal charges.

    The facilities also are living testimony to a broken system for adjudicating immigration cases. There are 215 federal immigration judges serving in 53 immigration courts across the country. Last year, they handled more than 350,000 specific matters, including 270,000 individual cases.

    The backlog is so strained that U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez, the grandson of Mexican immigrants, noted: “The department and the federal courts are straining under the weight of an immigration litigation system that is broken. Under the current system, criminal aliens generally receive more opportunities for judicial review of their removal orders than noncriminal aliens.”

    In short, illegal immigrants who commit crimes get speedier legal attention than these children, who have done nothing wrong other than follow their parents.

    Nothing will change until reforms are initiated, and Congress has done little to fix a broken immigration policy and the machinery to enforce it. The result is the private prison facility in Taylor and a smaller one in Pennsylvania .

    According to those familiar with the families in the private prison, children of those apprehended are dressed in prison jumpsuits and receive only one hour of schooling and one hour of recreation a day. The trade-off is that they get to remain with their families.

    Hard information on the program and the private prison is difficult to come by. The company running the prison refers questions to the immigration office, and the immigration office has had little to say about the situation.

    News of the 400 people — 200 of them children — being held in the T. Don Hutto unit in Taylor has sparked protests from several groups interested in immigrant issues. They are concerned about everything from care and feeding of those being held to the psychological effect of incarceration on children and families.

    Federal authorities began detaining all unauthorized immigrants last summer. The reason for the detention was that so many who were charged with unauthorized entry into the United States never appeared for their court dates. They melted back into the population.

    It is understandable in this age of terrorism that authorities want to keep tabs on illegal immigrants and ensure their appearances in courts. But there should be a way to see that they have their day in court without imprisoning their children.

    Keeping families intact would appear to be a humane policy, as well. But the result of the new detention policy has been to jail children, and that is not acceptable. Those who have visited the detainees, some of whom are seeking political asylum, say the detention is damaging.

    Little kids in prison jumpsuits and nametags presents a sad picture. Children are truly at the mercy of their parents, and incarceration cannot be good for their physical, mental or emotional health.

    For reasons of security and the law, a close watch on the nation’s borders is warranted. But what isn’t acceptable is jailing mothers and children awaiting a hearing on their status.

    There has to be a better way.

  • Why Language is So Important

    To follow CCA’s lead and call the Hutto jail a “residential center” is newspeak we won’t support. Even “detention” seems less overt than it should be. We don’t object to Jay Johnson-Castro’s “prison camp,” but jail is so much easier to type over and over again.

    At any rate, look what happens when search engines get to talking to each other. Google keyword, T. Don Hutto:

    Hutto, Texas Guide to Local Hotels, Lodging, Restaurants, Real …
    The T. Don Hutto Residential Center, a private detention facility in Taylor, Texas, is emblematic of new federal policy that detains all unauthorized …
    huttotx.usl.myareaguide.com/ – 76k – Cached – Similar pages
    On the subject of America as a Corrections Corporation, where half of the people can be hired to keep the other half locked up, here’s a summer recollection:

    Down in Pinal County: The Pun’s on US As the company presents it: here is a March 2006 pitch in pdf format to a Lehman Brothers Conference.

  • El Paso Sector Arrests Up, Deployment not Quite on Schedule

    The El Paso border sector, which includes all of New Mexico and two Texas counties, reports an increase of border arrests year-to-date. The Border Patrol Chief testified in Congress last week that overall border arrests were down for the past few months, but news reports usually added that border crossings usually decline at the peak of summer heat.

    Meanwhie, in a story about Nevada troops soon to be baking in the Arizona sun, the AP continues to hint that the border deployment is not keeping up to schedule, a claim that has in the past drawn attention from the White House response team. Still, we would love to see the plan for Operation Jump Start so we can judge for ourselves.

    We do have an FOI request that has been forwarded to Washington. With all the celebration of guard troops as citizen-soldiers, we hope for a day when citizen-journalists will have value in the eyes of the nation, too.–gm Arrests along N.M.-Mexico border increase

    July 27, 2006, 10:56 AM

    WASHINGTON — Arrests of would-be illegal immigrants along a section of the Mexican border that includes New Mexico have increased 13 percent in the last 10 months, the U.S. Border Patrol said.

    The increase comes as arrests along the entire U.S.-Mexico border have dropped since President Bush ordered the military to help tighten the border.

    Border Patrol Chief David Aguilar said Tuesday that New Mexico arrests were up because the area had been shortchanged on resources to fight illegal immigration in the past.

    The Border Patrol “had not been able to do a very good job” in the Deming and Lordsburg areas, Aguilar said.

    “We just didn’t have any resources,” he said.

    Spurred by complaints from New Mexico politicians, the Border Patrol added 305 agents to the El Paso Sector of the border, which includes all of New Mexico and Texas’ two westernmost counties.

    Doug Mosier, a spokesman for the El Paso sector, said 1,642 agents are assigned to the sector with plans to raise that number to 1,900 by year’s end.

    New Mexico also has 692 of the 4,500 National Guardsmen that Bush ordered deployed to California, New Mexico, Texas and Arizona.

    From Oct. 1, the start of the federal fiscal year, through Sunday, 110,217 illegal immigrants were caught in the El Paso sector of the border. That compares with 97,194 arrests during the same period the previous fiscal year.

    Along the entire U.S.-Mexican border, Aguilar reported a 45 percent decline in the number of people arrested from May 16, a day after Bush announced he would deploy National Guard troops to the border, to July 23.

    Sen. Jeff Bingaman, D-N.M., said for the last several years he has been urging the Bush administration to deploy more resources to New Mexico’s border.

    “I’m glad that the White House has finally recognized that things have, in fact, not been under control and has begun to take the problem seriously,” Bingaman said.

    Rep. Steve Pearce, R-N.M., said there has been a “dramatic” change since August, when “high-ranking officials in El Paso seemed unaware and unconcerned about the problem, and unwilling to make significant changes.”

    A spokesman for Gov. Bill Richardson says the increased arrests in New Mexico show why the governor declared a state of emergency along the border last year and freed up $1.75 million in state funds to help county law enforcement along the border.

    “The National Guard deployment is a helpful stopgap, but the governor still believes that what are needed are additional, permanent Border Patrol agents along the New Mexico border,” Goldstein said.

    Copyright 2006 Associated Press.


    130 Nev. Guardsmen will arrive Saturday

    the associated press

    Tucson, Arizona | Published: 07.28.2006

    CARSON CITY, Nev. — About 130 members of the Nevada Army and Air National Guard leave Saturday for duty along the Arizona-Mexico border as part of Operation Jump Start, designed to keep illegal immigrants from crossing into the United States.
    Members of the 152nd Civil Engineering Squadron, based in Reno, and soldiers from the 150th Maintenance Company based in Carson City and Las Vegas, will travel to several locations in Arizona as part of two- and three-week rotations.

    They’ll assist U.S. Customs and Border Protection personnel near Phoenix, Nogales, Tucson and Yuma.
    President Bush’s “Jump Start” plan called for 6,000 troops to be on the border in support roles by this weekend. But officials in border states have said the Guard would likely need more time to meet that mark.

    Bush has said the mission will free up thousands of officers now on other duties to actively patrol the border. Guardsmen are building fences, conducting routine surveillance and taking care of other administrative duties for the border patrol.

    Bush’s plan called for all 50 states to send troops, but not all states immediately signed commitments. Some state officials argued that they couldn’t free up Guard members because of responsibilities in their home states.